The University of California, Davis, placed two campus police officers on leave Sunday, after they pepper sprayed protesters who were peacefully blocking a walkway in a show of support for the Occupy movement. (See the video below). The president of the University of California system said he was "appalled" by videos of the Friday incident, which went viral online. UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi ordered an investigation and took "full responsibility," but resisted calls for her resignation. Was there any justification for treating the demonstrators this way?
No. This is just plain wrong: There's no way to sugarcoat this "chilling" video, says Philip Kennicott at The Washington Post. Watching an officer "applying a toxic chemical to humans as if they were garden pests is shocking." Campus police say the officer wielding the spray can was just doing his job. But if this is standard procedure, the standards need to be changed.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sadly, the police had no better option: What happened wasn't pretty, says Jay Tea at Wizbang, but the cops really had no choice. They have a duty to uphold the law. The protesters were blocking a public sidewalk and refused to move. The cops couldn't just walk away. Was pepper spray "a great choice"? Of course not. The visuals are damning, "but I don't see how any of the other options" — Tasers, say, or physical force — would have been any better.
Well, it's disturbing that this is even an option: It's scary "how common such excessive police force has been in response to the Occupy protests." says Glenn Greenwald at Salon. We have militarized our local police in the name of fighting terrorism, and we're now living in a "police state." Our rights to free speech and assembly may be "flamboyantly guaranteed by the U.S. constitution," but "if a population becomes bullied or intimidated out of exercising rights offered on paper, those rights effectively cease to exist."
"The roots of the UC-Davis pepper-spraying"
Take a look at the pepper-spray incident:
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
