Should Hollywood make more Transformers films without Shia LaBeouf?

For better or worse, two more blockbusters about giant warring robots are in the works — but without the franchise's leading man

Shia LaBeouf
(Image credit: Paramount Pictures)

Each of the first three Transformers movies was pummeled by critics, with the second being branded the "worst blockbuster of all time." But money talks, and in the case of the $3 billion Transformers franchise, it's screaming, "More sequels!" Hence the news Tuesday that the Michael Bay series about alien robots hell-bent on destroying the world will get a fourth and fifth installment. Bay and Steven Spielberg will be back on board as producers (though Bay may not direct), but star Shia LaBeouf has publicly stated that he is done with the series. Reports are that Crank star Jason Statham will take over as the film's leading man. Is Transformers wise to soldier on without LaBeouf?

Replacements are always a bad idea: "It's almost never going to be good when the lead actor in a franchise is replaced in the sequel," says Naomi Creason at The Sentinel. Speed 2 crashed without Keanu Reeves, and it took 16 years and three attempts at recasting the Caped Crusader to make another Batman sequel work after Michael Keaton bailed. And let's not forget Transformer's own spotty track record with casting replacements. Is there anyone who thinks Rosie Huntington-Whitley is better than Megan Fox?

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up