Free birth control — and other breakthroughs in women's health care
New changes to federal health care rules will require insurers to offer a raft of free health services to women

This week's announcement that the Obama administration's health care reforms will make birth control available without a co-pay met with considerable enthusiasm from women's health advocates. The news followed the Department of Health and Human Services' decision to adopt a recommendation from the Institute of Medicine that encouraged preventative health services for women. Contraceptives, however, are only one part of the new changes to the health care landscape: Women are expected to benefit from a number of additional health care services that most insurers will now be required to offer. Here's what you need to know:
What's changing?
Beyond birth control pills, the list of preventative health services that will be completely covered — with no co-pay or deductible — is impressive. Coverage will now include an annual "well-woman" preventive care visit, diabetes screening during pregnancy, screening for the HPV virus that can cause cervical cancer, support for breast-feeding mothers (including breast pump rental reimbursement), as well as screening and counseling for sexually transmitted infections, HIV infections, and domestic violence.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Is everyone in favor of these changes?
No. The new regulations have met with a whole lot of resistance from some conservative and religious groups, even though faith-based organizations that offer health care to their employees can opt out of providing contraceptive services. "The unfunded mandate of forcing private employers to pay for these good things is socialism, pure and simple," says attorney Harmeet Dhillon, who heads the San Francisco Republican Party, as quoted in the San Francisco Chronicle.
When will these changes take effect?
For most insurance companies operating on a calendar-year basis, the new requirements take effect January 1, 2013. For insurance policies beginning on or after Aug. 1, 2012, the new requirements take effect immediately. Some health plans already in place will be temporarily exempt from providing preventative services because of a "grandfather clause," but as these plans are modified over time, they too will have to follow the new requirements.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Sources: Forbes, NY Times, SF Chronicle
-
Why Turkey's Kurdish insurgents are laying down their arms
Under the Radar The PKK said its aims can now be 'resolved through democratic politics'
-
Book reviews: 'Girl on Girl: How Pop Culture Turned a Generation of Women Against Themselves' and 'Notes to John'
Feature The aughts' toxic pop culture and Joan Didion's most private pages
-
The FDA plans to embrace AI agencywide
In the Spotlight Rumors are swirling about a bespoke AI chatbot being developed for the FDA by OpenAI
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy