Obama, GOP in a debt-ceiling standoff
The government has reached an impasse over what conditions should be attached to raising the nation's $14.3 trillion debt ceiling.
What happened
With a government default looming, President Obama summoned Republican congressional leaders to the White House this week for face-to-face negotiations over raising the federal debt ceiling. Democrats and Republicans had reached an impasse over what conditions should be attached to raising the government’s $14.3 trillion debt ceiling, which will be reached on Aug. 2. The Democrats have agreed to a $2 trillion package of spending cuts over the next decade, but also want to raise about $400 billion in revenue by eliminating tax breaks and deductions that benefit oil companies, owners of corporate jets, and those in the highest tax bracket. “I think it’s only fair to ask an oil company or a corporate jet owner that has done so well to give up a tax break that no other business enjoys,” said the president.
But GOP leaders remained adamant that they would not agree to tax increases of any kind. “The American people don’t want their taxes raised, and they wanted us to cut spending,” said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) “They don’t want compromise.” The White House has warned that Congress must reach a consensus by July 22, to give it time to issue new debt bonds. If the U.S. were to default on its debt obligations, many economists warn, Uncle Sam’s credibility would be ruined, the value of the dollar would likely plummet, and interest rates would surge, possibly leading to another deep recession. But Obama expressed optimism that he could broker a deal. “It’s my hope that everyone is going to leave their ultimatums at the door,” Obama said.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the editorials said
It’s easy to see why the Republicans are playing hardball, said The Economist. Conservative voters are “implacably opposed” to raising the debt ceiling, on the mistaken belief that doing so opens the door to “future profligacy,’’ instead of paying debts already incurred. Still, legislators will be viewed as traitors if they agree to tax increases. “It still makes sense for Republicans to hold out to the last minute and extract the best deal possible.”
This “game of chicken” has gone far enough, said the Los Angeles Times. The Republicans are right to insist that the government end its spending binge. But, while federal spending makes up roughly 25 percent of gross domestic product, revenues constitute just 14 percent—a 70-year low. Clearly, “spending cuts alone” can’t erase annual deficits now surpassing $1 trillion. The time for ideological posturing is over. “Cut a deal.”
What the columnists said
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The Republican Party doesn’t want a deal, said Michael Tomasky in TheDailyBeast.com. Its leaders want the government to slide into default, and catastrophe to result, because they know that a lousy economy is their “only shot at gaining power.” That’s why the president ought to invoke the 14th Amendment, said Katrina vanden Heuvel in The Washington Post, which says that “the validity of the public debt of the United States...shall not be questioned.” Obama can argue that the clause gives him the right to order the Treasury to continue paying America’s bills, even if Congress fails to authorize it. It may be the only way to defuse the “bomb Republicans have strapped to the hostage.”
It’s overburdened taxpayers and underemployed workers who are being held hostage, said James Pethokoukis in Reuters.com. The U.S. economy is “sputtering,” with a measly 1.9 percent growth rate. Raising taxes on investors and businesses would certainly push us back into recession, while faster economic growth would lead to higher tax revenues. “The GOP should stick to its guns.”
The Republicans have already won this debate, said David Brooks in The New York Times. Democrats have offered them “the deal of the century”—trillions in spending cuts, in exchange for closing some “distortionary” tax loopholes affecting a tiny percentage of the population. But the extremists who’ve hijacked the GOP would prefer to let the nation default rather than give an inch on their “sacred fixation” on taxes. The GOP must decide what party it wants to be—a responsible conservative party, or an “odd protest movement” of unyielding fanatics that is unfit to govern.
-
Film reviews: 'Wicked: For Good' and 'Rental Family'Feature Glinda the Good is forced to choose sides and an actor takes work filling holes in strangers' lives
-
‘Like a gas chamber’: the air pollution throttling DelhiUnder The Radar Indian capital has tried cloud seeding to address the crisis, which has seen schools closed and outdoor events suspended
-
Political cartoons for November 23Cartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include a Thanksgiving horn of plenty, the naughty list, and more
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration