California’s jails: The door swings open
The Supreme Court ruled that California's overcrowded prisons violate the Constitution’s prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment.”
It was a “win for dignity,” said The Economist in an editorial. Last week, in a bitterly divided, 5–4 decision, the United States Supreme Court affirmed that the nightmarish conditions in California’s prisons violate the Constitution’s prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment,” and ordered the state to release up to 46,000 prisoners over the next two years. The state is now jamming 143,000 prisoners into jails designed for 80,000, with inmates doubled up in tiny, one-man cells, stacked like cordwood in prison gyms, and lying ill in telephone-booth-sized, urine-soaked cages. The decision drew bizarre, over-the-top dissents from Justices Samuel Alito, who predicted “a grim roster of victims,” and Antonin Scalia, who wrote sarcastically about the release of “fine physical specimens who have developed intimidating muscles pumping iron in the prison gym.” In reality, most of those who’ll be released will be nonviolent criminals, said Steve Chapman in the Chicago Tribune. Besides, when American prisons become gulags approaching “Stalinist standards of barbarity, something has to be done.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose swing vote decided this case, “has no idea what he has done,” said Debra Saunders in the San Francisco Chronicle. Dumping tens of thousands of convicted felons back on the streets of California is “doomed to be followed by brutal crime,” which will prompt public calls for harsher punishments, and we will quickly be back where we started. California’s prisons may be crowded, said The Wall Street Journal, but they are crowded with “people who society has decided, through a fair and impartial judicial system, are dangerous or deserve to be punished.” For the court to effectively overturn tens of thousands of these convictions, Justice Scalia wrote, is “perhaps the most radical injunction issued by a court in our nation’s history.”
“Don’t get mad at the Supreme Court,” said Bruce Maiman in the Sacramento Bee. Blame this fiasco on California’s lawmakers. To please voters, they’ve instituted ever-tougher anti-crime policies that put and keep more and more people in jail, while ignoring the reality that these policies require the construction of expensive new prisons. What Scalia, Alito, and tough-on-crime conservatives forget, said Michael Gerson in The Washington Post, is that the vast majority of prisoners are eventually released anyway. “It is absurd and outrageous to treat them like animals while hoping they return to us as responsible citizens.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why more and more adults are reaching for soft toys
Under The Radar Does the popularity of the Squishmallow show Gen Z are 'scared to grow up'?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published