Can Robert Pattinson be a movie star without 'Twilight'?

The British heartthrob is back on the Hollywood radar screen with "Water for Elephants." But is there life after Edward?

Robert Pattinson in his movie "Water for Elephants," which drew $17.5 million opening weekend from an older audience than the Twilight star is used to.
(Image credit: Facebook/ Water for Elephants)

Robert Pattinson is best known for his role as Edward, the moody vampire/sex symbol in three hit Twilight movies. He hasn't had much luck in the past with artier onscreen fare. His 2008 Salvador Dalí biopic Little Ashes and last year's Remember Me were both duds. But last weekend, Pattinson scored a modest hit with Water for Elephants, an adaption of Sara Gruen's best-selling novel about a traveling circus in the 1930s. The film, which co-stars Reese Witherspoon, earned $17.5 million at the box office, appealing mostly to an older audience. Does this mean he has a bright post-Twilight future ahead of him?

This is a start: "Pattinson has yet to prove he is an evergreen box-office draw, outside of vamping it up in the Twilight series," says Jeff Bock, a box-office analyst for Exhibitor Relations, as quoted by MTV. But Water for Elephants is a step in the right direction, since "it wasn't too much of a stretch," and appeals to his core audience of women. Plus, Pattinson avoided the mistake of many matinee idols, who play a "drug dealer or pathological killer just to shed their public persona" and end up alienating their fans.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up