Is South Dakota legalizing the murder of abortion doctors?
State legislators are considering a bill that would expand the definition of "justifiable homicide," and, some say, make it legal to kill abortion providers

According to an "incendiary" Mother Jones report, some South Dakota leaders want to legalize the murder of abortion providers. A bill being considered by state legislators would alter the definition of "justifiable homicide" to include killings in the name of preventing harm to a fetus, a change "that could make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions," says Kate Sheppard in Mother Jones. "In theory," the bill would "allow a woman's father, mother, son, daughter, or husband to kill anyone who tried to provide that woman an abortion — even if she wanted one," says Sheppard, who notes that the bill's sponsor, Rep. Phil Jensen, is "a committed foe of abortion rights," and that South Dakota already has some of the "most restrictive abortion laws in the country." Is Sheppard's interpretation of the bill accurate?
Settle down. This isn't even about abortion: The bill would not condone killing doctors who perform abortions, says Rep. Jensen, the legislation's chief sponsor, as quoted in The Washington Post, because it only pertains to illegal acts, not legal ones like abortion. But if a pregnant woman were beat badly by an ex-boyfriend and she killed him, her act would be justified because she would be "resisting an effort to murder her unborn child."
"South Dakota legislator defends bill to make killing to defend fetuses a "justifiable homicide"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But the bill is too ambiguous: Even given Jensen's point that the bill pertains only to illegal acts, says Amy Sullivan at Time, "that's an awfully thin semantic line... especially given the increasing array of restrictions that surround abortion in the state." What if a doctor performs an abortion on a teen who has not obtained her parent's consent, as required by South Dakota law? Does that mean the abortion is illegal and, therefore, that "the doc is fair game" for a would-be murderer?
"Re: so much for thou shalt not kill"
And, actually, the bill is about abortion: Jensen's denial that the bill isn't about killing abortion doctors doesn't quite make sense, says Jillian Rayfield at Talking Points Memo. "The law already protects people (including, presumably, pregnant women) who commit murder in self-defense, and those who might commit murder while defending someone else."
"South Dakota bill could legalize murder of abortion providers"
This is part of something bigger: This bill is part of the GOP's "recent barrage of anti-reproductive rights bills [that] betray 'a broader national strategy' by pro-life advocates to manufacture callous, often perverse, obstacles to women's reproductive rights," says Tanya Somanader at ThinkProgress. The GOP came into power by promising job creation, but instead they've delivered a vast assault on women's reproductive rights.
"REPORT: The five ways that the GOP is trying to eradicate a woman’s right to choose"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Test driving the Rolls-Royce Spectre Black Badge
The Week Recommends We take the most powerful Rolls-Royce ever built for a spin in Barcelona
By Fergus Scholes Published
-
Tuberculosis is seeing a resurgence, and it's only going to get worse
Under the radar The spread of the deadly infection is buoyed by global unrest
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Sudoku hard: April 03, 2025
The Week's daily hard sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published