Is South Dakota legalizing the murder of abortion doctors?
State legislators are considering a bill that would expand the definition of "justifiable homicide," and, some say, make it legal to kill abortion providers
According to an "incendiary" Mother Jones report, some South Dakota leaders want to legalize the murder of abortion providers. A bill being considered by state legislators would alter the definition of "justifiable homicide" to include killings in the name of preventing harm to a fetus, a change "that could make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions," says Kate Sheppard in Mother Jones. "In theory," the bill would "allow a woman's father, mother, son, daughter, or husband to kill anyone who tried to provide that woman an abortion — even if she wanted one," says Sheppard, who notes that the bill's sponsor, Rep. Phil Jensen, is "a committed foe of abortion rights," and that South Dakota already has some of the "most restrictive abortion laws in the country." Is Sheppard's interpretation of the bill accurate?
Settle down. This isn't even about abortion: The bill would not condone killing doctors who perform abortions, says Rep. Jensen, the legislation's chief sponsor, as quoted in The Washington Post, because it only pertains to illegal acts, not legal ones like abortion. But if a pregnant woman were beat badly by an ex-boyfriend and she killed him, her act would be justified because she would be "resisting an effort to murder her unborn child."
"South Dakota legislator defends bill to make killing to defend fetuses a "justifiable homicide"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But the bill is too ambiguous: Even given Jensen's point that the bill pertains only to illegal acts, says Amy Sullivan at Time, "that's an awfully thin semantic line... especially given the increasing array of restrictions that surround abortion in the state." What if a doctor performs an abortion on a teen who has not obtained her parent's consent, as required by South Dakota law? Does that mean the abortion is illegal and, therefore, that "the doc is fair game" for a would-be murderer?
"Re: so much for thou shalt not kill"
And, actually, the bill is about abortion: Jensen's denial that the bill isn't about killing abortion doctors doesn't quite make sense, says Jillian Rayfield at Talking Points Memo. "The law already protects people (including, presumably, pregnant women) who commit murder in self-defense, and those who might commit murder while defending someone else."
"South Dakota bill could legalize murder of abortion providers"
This is part of something bigger: This bill is part of the GOP's "recent barrage of anti-reproductive rights bills [that] betray 'a broader national strategy' by pro-life advocates to manufacture callous, often perverse, obstacles to women's reproductive rights," says Tanya Somanader at ThinkProgress. The GOP came into power by promising job creation, but instead they've delivered a vast assault on women's reproductive rights.
"REPORT: The five ways that the GOP is trying to eradicate a woman’s right to choose"
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Georgia's new foreign influence bill
Under the Radar Critics claim the 'Russian law' could stifle dissent and wreck the country's chances of joining the EU
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
'Making a police state out of the liberal university'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
8 looming climate tipping points that imperil our planet
The Explainer New reports detail the thresholds we may be close to crossing
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published