Issue of the week: Obama lays an egg in Seoul
At the G-20 summit, the President failed to persuade other nations to condemn China’s currency manipulation, and he was berated for the Fed's decision to pump more money into the U.S. economy.
Well, that could have gone better, said Christi Parsons, John Glionna, and Don Lee in the Los Angeles Times. Last week’s G-20 summit in Seoul was “frequently rancorous,” produced “far more setbacks than gains,” and highlighted the group’s “inability to find common ground” on steps to avert currency and trade wars. President Obama, who was counting on the summit to restore some of the luster rubbed off by the midterm elections, “suffered the biggest disappointment.” He failed to persuade other nations to condemn China’s currency manipulation and he took a drubbing for the Federal Reserve’s “recent decision to pump $600 billion into the U.S. financial system.” He also couldn’t reach agreement with South Korean President Lee Myung-bak on a long-delayed free-trade pact. The only thing the summiteers—heads of state from the leading economies of the industrialized and developing worlds—managed to produce was a mushy promise to monitor trade imbalances, said Howard Schneider and Scott Wilson in The Washington Post. But even that undertaking “deferred the substance of the work” to a later date.
Obama and his treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, have only themselves to blame for their rude reception, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. The president arrived in Seoul “blaming the rest of the world for U.S. economic weakness.” Rather than take responsibility for mismanaging America’s finances, Obama faulted “the export and exchange-rate policies of the Germans, Chinese, or Brazilians.” Obama wasn’t alone in playing the blame game, said the Financial Times. The entire meeting was a “joint abdication of power.” The G-20, which in the darkest days of the 2008 financial crisis worked together to avert worldwide depression, has devolved into a spectacle in which “old and emerging powers agree to disagree.” Their failure to take collective action to speed the industrialized world’s recovery and to prevent developing economies from overheating will only end up “making things harder for each other.”
The criticism of the Fed’s policy is “understandable but shortsighted,” said The New York Times. America’s trading partners worry that the Fed’s injection of $600 billion into the economy will “harm their export sectors,” but in fact, it’s designed to “head off deflation” and boost demand at home, including demand for exports. If the Fed can “spur households and businesses to spend and invest,” it will earn praise for reinvigorating “one of the main sources of global demand and global growth.” Until then, however, Obama will have to live with the consequences of “a weak economy, heavy external debt burden, and general loss of faith in American capitalism,” said Alan Beattie in the Financial Times. “This, perhaps, is what the decline of economic hegemony looks like.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The hidden cost of lead exposure on American mental health
Under The Radar Millions of mental health diagnoses have been linked to childhood lead exposure in new study
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
What exactly are tariffs and how do they work?
The explainer Refresh your understanding ahead of Donald Trump's promise to levy heavy tariffs once he's back in office
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: December 11, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published