Why liberals don't get the Tea Party movement
Tea Partiers are standing up for a commitment to limited government that begins with the Founders, says Peter Berkowitz in the WSJ. Do progressives not know their history?
"Highly educated people say the darndest things," says Peter Berkowitz in The Wall Street Journal. Consider the nonsense self-satisfied smarties spout about the Tea Party movement. In April, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman insisted the protest movement was "AstroTurf," not a spontaneous grassroots outpouring of anger at Big Government spending. Later critics dismissed Tea Partiers as leaderless rabble afflicted with an anti-government delirium that once caused the Anti-Federalists to oppose the Constitution because they thought it concentrated too much authority in Washington. But the Tea Party's "devotion to limited government" is not some crackpot belief concocted by a bunch of "clowns, kooks, and creeps" — it's a conviction our nation's founders shared. And the Tea Party's liberal detractors would see that if our universities hadn't given up teaching the history of American constitutional government decades ago. Here, an excerpt:
The devotion to limited government lies at the heart of the American experiment in liberal democracy. The Federalists who won ratification of the Constitution — most notably Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay — shared with their Anti-Federalist opponents the view that centralized power presented a formidable and abiding threat to the individual liberty that it was government's primary task to secure. They differed over how to deal with the threat...
The Tea Party movement's focus on keeping government within bounds and answerable to the people reflects the devotion to limited government embodied in the Constitution. One reason this is poorly understood among our best educated citizens is that American politics is poorly taught at the universities that credentialed them. ... Our universities have produced two generations of highly educated people who seem unable to recognize the spirited defense of fundamental American principles, even when it takes place for more than a year and a half right in front of their noses.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Read the full article at The Wall Street Journal.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Starbucks workers are planning their ‘biggest strike’ everThe Explainer The union said 92% of its members voted to strike
-
‘These wouldn’t be playgrounds for billionaires’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The 5 best nuclear war movies of all time‘A House of Dynamite’ reanimates a dormant cinematic genre for our new age of atomic insecurity
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration