Afghanistan: Obama’s war with the Pentagon
The president and the military are at odds over a July 2011 deadline for withdrawing troops from Afghanistan.
President Obama is on a collision course with the Pentagon, said Peter Beinart in TheDailyBeast.com. Gen. David Petraeus and the Pentagon have been “pushing for a full-on counterinsurgency effort” in Afghanistan, and conducting a lobbying campaign through leaks and surrogates to erode Obama’s July 2011 deadline to begin withdrawing troops. With the Taliban’s strength growing, and Afghan President Hamid Karzai wallowing in “mind-boggling corruption,” Obama has become increasingly reluctant to spend “massive amounts of blood and treasure” on a failing war. Last week, Obama replaced his national security advisor, Gen. James Jones, who had straddled the Pentagon–White House divide, with Jones’ deputy, Thomas Donilon. It’s a deeply significant switch: Donilon is a longtime Democratic Party loyalist and former aide to Vice President Joe Biden, known to share Biden’s deep skepticism that the war is winnable. Donilon’s promotion can mean only one thing: Obama wants another ally in the coming “bureaucratic knife fight” over withdrawal.
To understand the White House’s views on the war, said David Ignatius in The Washington Post, consider the grim report it leaked last week. The report declares that this year’s surge of 30,000 U.S. troops into Afghanistan, which Petraeus championed, has produced “minor” and “uneven” gains. Further, the report states that U.S. efforts have been compromised by Pakistan’s refusal to mount a new offensive against the Taliban and al Qaida forces operating from Pakistani territory. Petraeus is running out of time, said Fred Kaplan in Slate.com. Obama bought into Petraeus’ strategy, but “if the war’s trends continue to go south,” Donilon will be tasked with engineering a “speedier withdrawal or another shift in strategy.”
This is hardly the time to give up, said Michael Gerson in The Washington Post. The troop surge has enabled U.S. and NATO commanders to mount intense pressure on the enemy, with up to 10 deadly attacks on their strongholds every night. With low- and middle-level Taliban fighters now in real fear for their lives, “the psychological battlefield” has shifted, and small groups of the insurgents are now approaching Afghan officials to ask “what kind of deal they might get.” This is the objective of Petraeus’ strategy—to encourage “political reconciliation” with Taliban rank and file while isolating hard-core terrorists. But if the U.S. signals it is really pulling out in July, it will undermine all of the military’s work. Obama must make it clear “that America is not abandoning Afghanistan.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published