Congress: Why Democrats are running scared
The Republicans could gain control of the House of Representatives in November's midterm elections. Even the Senate is not secure.
“This is a miserable time to be a Democratic politician,” said The Economist in an editorial. With the economy struggling and unemployment stuck at 9.5 percent, “the country is in the sort of unhappy and scratchy mood that voters in midterms habitually take out on the president’s party.” In an apparent sign of resignation, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said this week that “there are enough seats in play” that Republicans “could gain control” of the House of Representatives by taking 39 or more seats in November’s midterm elections. With Obama’s approval rating sinking into the 40s, and a large majority of voters dissatisfied with the country’s direction, many objective political analysts agree. Even Democratic control of the Senate—where Republicans need 10 seats to gain a majority—is not secure. With a “thumping” assured in November, the only question is: How bad will it be?
It will be a beating Democrats “are not likely to forget soon,” said Karl Rove in The Wall Street Journal. The backlash to Obama’s big-government policies has created a major “intensity gap.” Gallup reports that 45 percent of Republican voters are “very enthusiastic” about voting this year, while only 24 percent of Democratic voters are. If dispirited Democrats stay home, it’ll be a rout. And if it is, credit the GOP’s “gridlock strategy,” said E.J. Dionne in The Washington Post. By blocking and delaying the White House’s agenda whenever possible, and sabotaging Obama’s promise of bipartisanship, the GOP erased the glow left over from his historic election, and made Washington look petty, mean, and disconnected from real people’s problems. Who gets punished? The party in power.
Only one thing can save Democrats now, said Noam Scheiber in The New Republic Online—and that’s Republicans. While voters are furious at Democrats, 62 percent say they would have “reservations or be uncomfortable” with a candidate who “supported the economic policies of George W. Bush.” Still, most voters will blame Democrats—and not Bush—for their current troubles, said Ezra Klein in The Washington Post. Based on an analysis of several decades’ worth of results, political scientists say that elections are decided almost entirely on how people feel about the economy. With joblessness and stagnation still gripping the nation, “the White House may as well just govern”—and take its lumps in November.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Political cartoons for November 1Cartoons Saturday's political cartoons include insurance premiums, early voting in NYC, and more
-
Salted caramel and chocolate tart recipeThe Week Recommends Delicious dessert can be made with any biscuits you fancy
-
Meet Ireland’s new socialist presidentIn the Spotlight Landslide victory of former barrister and ‘outsider’ Catherine Connolly could ‘mark a turning point’ in anti-establishment politics
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to goThe Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'