A federal appeals court has struck down the Federal Communications Commission’s ban on the airing of “fleeting expletives,” saying the speech restriction was unconstitutionally broad and vague. The FCC had invoked the policy in several instances of celebrities using profanities during live broadcasts, fining the networks that had aired the blue language.
The court’s unanimous ruling said the FCC’s current policy creates “a chilling effect” on speech, because broadcasters could not be certain what language would fall foul of the FCC’s standards. But the court said that the commission could set speech standards, if they were more precise than the current ones.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
-
-
talking pointsWill the Cornell rape case spur accountability nationwide? -
QUOTE OF THE DAY‘We are no longer the woke department or the weak department. Simple translation of that: no fatties, no trannies, no beardos, no weirdos.’ -
today’s big questionAre Cabinet impeachments coming after the midterms?
-
-
-
talking pointsWill the Cornell rape case spur accountability nationwide?
-
QUOTE OF THE DAY‘We are no longer the woke department or the weak department. Simple translation of that: no fatties, no trannies, no beardos, no weirdos.’
-
today’s big questionAre Cabinet impeachments coming after the midterms?
-