Obama's drilling moratorium, round 2

The Obama administration says a deepwater ban is necessary. But is it worth the potential toll on the economy?

Obama meets with locals affected by the oil spill in Louisiana.
(Image credit: Getty)

Despite two federal court rejections of a drilling moratorium in the Gulf of Mexico, President Obama has ordered a second round of deepwater suspensions while federal investigators examine the BP catastrophe. "A pause on deepwater drilling," said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar in an official announcement, "is essential and appropriate to protect communities, coasts, and wildlife from the risks that deepwater drilling currently pose." But some say the drilling ban, which could last until Nov. 30, might ultimately prove more harmful to the region than the oil spill itself. Is Obama right to reinstate the deepwater moratorium? (Watch a Fox Business report about Obama's second moratorium)

Drill, baby, drill — please! Obama's drilling ban is entirely "wrongheaded," says the Houston Chronicle in an editorial. It will "cost tens of thousands of drilling-related jobs across the Gulf," and reduce funds to the federal Treasury "by drying up royalties in federally owned areas." Deepwater drilling needs to be safer, but decimating the economy isn't the way to achieve that goal.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up