The Pentagon's $4.4 million 'gaydar' project
The military is polling rank-and-file soldiers to see how they feel about repealing 'don't ask, don't tell.' Is that wise?

The Pentagon is surveying 400,000 troops on the possible repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays in the military, and gay-rights groups are calling foul. The survey, developed and administered under a $4.4 million contract with research firm Westat, is part of the Defense Department's review of the policy barring openly gay people from serving in the military, and includes questions about whether soldiers suspect people in their units of being gay. What does testing soldiers' "gaydar" accomplish? (Watch activist Dan Choi sound off on the military survey.)
Nothing. This is a waste of taxpayer money: Asking soldiers how they feel about DADT (the survey doesn't) could be useful, says Nate Silver in FiveThirtyEight, but encouraging them "to use their 'gaydar'" is worse than "useless." Since gay soldiers are, by dictate, closeted, the survey relies on "gossip" to predict the effect of openly gay soldiers on morale. And the soldiers most likely to see phantom gay colleagues are homophobes and soldiers in units where morale is low.
"Pentagon spends $4.4 million to test troops' gaydar"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Honesty is the best policy: If there's rampant homophobia or resistance to changing DADT, we have to be prepared, not "put our head in the sand," says Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell, to Think Progress. That means some of the questions have to be phrased "in as candid a manner as possible." But remember, the survey is supposed to help "determine how to implement a repeal of DADT," not whether to repeal it in the first place.
"Pentagon pushes back against claim that DADT survey..."
Polling soldiers is a bad idea: Why ask soldiers what they want, then? asks Mark Thompson in Time. When Harry Truman integrated African-Americans in 1948, and when the Navy integrated woman in 1978, the military brass didn't poll the troops, they relied on the old maxim: "If we want you to have an opinion, we'll issue you one." Changing that ethos now sets a dangerous precedent, because it gives soldiers the impression they can veto policies they don't like.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The best crime fiction of 2025
The Week Recommends These page-turners will keep you on the edge of your seat
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK
-
Will divisions over trans issue derail Keir Starmer's government?
Today's Big Question Rebellion is brewing following the Supreme Court's ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex under equality law
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Why UK scientists are trying to dim the Sun
In The Spotlight The UK has funded controversial geoengineering techniques that could prove helpful in slowing climate change
By Abby Wilson
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK