Bibi and Barack reconcile
President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought to put their differences behind them as the Israeli leader offered to take “concrete steps” toward peace talks with the Palestinians.
After one of the worst rifts ever in U.S.-Israeli relations, President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week sought to put their differences behind them as the Israeli leader offered to take “concrete steps” toward peace talks with the Palestinians. Relations between the two nations were badly strained in March, when Israel announced plans to build Jewish homes in a Palestinian neighborhood of Jerusalem just as Vice President Joe Biden was visiting. Two weeks later, Obama pointedly declined to hold a joint appearance with Netanyahu following a tense White House meeting.
During this week’s Netanyahu visit, Obama praised Israel’s recent easing of the Gaza blockade and said Netanyahu was “willing to take risks for peace.” The two pledged to work toward direct talks with the Palestinians before September, when a moratorium on Israeli settlement building in the West Bank ends.
Nice “buddy-buddy” act, said Peter Beinart in TheDailyBeast.com, but it was just a cover for major differences between the two leaders. Netanyahu “didn’t utter the word ‘Gaza’” or make any reference to Palestinian statehood. That’s because he wants Obama to force the Palestinians into talks even though he has “zero interest in birthing a Palestinian state” while Hamas runs Gaza. “What kind of schmuck does Netanyahu think Obama is?”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Netanyahu has Obama right where he wants him, said Dana Milbank in The Washington Post. Obama’s tough stance against Israel in March cost him politically, as “the Israel lobby reared up” and “Democrats ran for cover.” Now, with midterm elections looming, Obama had to perform “the Full Monty of pro-Israel pandering.”
If only Obama truly were protecting Israel, said Meyrav Wurmser in National Review Online. Instead, he continues to press the delusion that the Palestinian issue is the main source of Middle East tension, when the real threat to the region is from Iranians and Turks. A “radical strategic alliance led by Iran” is heading for nuclear capability and has been seducing Turkey. But Obama is too busy badgering Israel into talks with Palestinians to take on this dangerous regional threat.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The Torridon: a luxury retreat nestled amid Highland splendour
The Week Recommends Deep in Scotland's mountainous northwest, this boutique hotel is a stirring contrast between five-star elegance and rugged natural grandeur
-
'Arise, Sir Goldenballs': David Beckham plays the long game in quest for knighthood
Talking Point Former footballer set to be knighted in King's birthday honours after years of snubs
-
Quiz of The Week: 31 May – 6 June
Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy