Attorney General Eric Holder says the Obama administration is pursuing criminal, not just civil, charges over BP's massive Gulf of Mexico oil gusher. Echoing earlier remarks by Obama, Holder vowed to "prosecute to the fullest extent" any person or company found to have broken the law. The federal government still needs BP to stop the leak and clean up the mess, however, so is threatening criminal charges now a good idea? (Watch Eric Holder announce the investigations into BP)
It's past time we threw the book at BP: Given BP's earlier felony convictions in connection to a 2006 spill in Alaska's North Slope, a criminal investigation "should have been the priority from day one," says Andrew Revkin in The New York Times. Presumably, federal lawyers and investigators have been sifting through the "petro-calamity" for "evidence of crimes" for weeks, but publicly turning up the heat on BP "felt way overdue."
"The Justice Department seeks evidence of crimes in the Gulf"
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
BP doesn't need this distraction now: "Obviously, if there's evidence of crimes, [BP] should be prosecuted," says Carol Platt Liebau in Townhall. But not now. Obama's "grandstanding" about criminal charges just means that BP has to play a hugely distracting game of "legal [cover your ass]" instead of focusing "100 percent on remediating the disaster." Americans want action, not lawsuits.
"Don't do anything — just sue someone"
The blame game can wait — for everyone: Yes, "the focus now should be on stopping the oil," says The Philadelphia Inquirer in an editorial. "Finger-pointing is what you do after an event is over" — but that should apply equally to those Republicans "smacking their lips in glee because they believe the BP oil spill will be as politically damaging to the president as it is environmentally harmful to the Gulf Coast."
-
Exploring ancient forests on three continentsThe Week Recommends Reconnecting with historic nature across the world
-
How oil tankers have been weaponisedThe Explainer The seizure of a Russian tanker in the Atlantic last week has drawn attention to the country’s clandestine shipping network
-
The rise of the spymaster: a ‘tectonic shift’ in Ukraine’s politicsIn the Spotlight President Zelenskyy’s new chief of staff, former head of military intelligence Kyrylo Budanov, is widely viewed as a potential successor
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
