BP spill: Is it the right time for Obama's criminal inquiry?

The Obama administration is scouring the BP oil spill for clues of a crime, but some commentators argue that an investigation is just a distraction

Protesters in Louisiana gather to rally against BP.
(Image credit: Corbis)

Attorney General Eric Holder says the Obama administration is pursuing criminal, not just civil, charges over BP's massive Gulf of Mexico oil gusher. Echoing earlier remarks by Obama, Holder vowed to "prosecute to the fullest extent" any person or company found to have broken the law. The federal government still needs BP to stop the leak and clean up the mess, however, so is threatening criminal charges now a good idea? (Watch Eric Holder announce the investigations into BP)

It's past time we threw the book at BP: Given BP's earlier felony convictions in connection to a 2006 spill in Alaska's North Slope, a criminal investigation "should have been the priority from day one," says Andrew Revkin in The New York Times. Presumably, federal lawyers and investigators have been sifting through the "petro-calamity" for "evidence of crimes" for weeks, but publicly turning up the heat on BP "felt way overdue."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up