Are the Democrats headed for another 1994? asked Adam Nagourney and Marjorie Connelly in The New York Times. That year, voters were fed up with both President Clinton and the Democratic Congress after an ugly health-care battle, and the midterm elections were a Republican rout, with the GOP taking control of both the House and the Senate. In the run-up to the 2010 midterms, both parties are feeling déjà vu—especially Democrats, “who are girding for big losses.” Poll numbers show a swing to the Republicans, with just 43 percent saying they would choose a Democrat in a congressional race if they went to the polls today, while 45 percent would pick a Republican. More important, Obama’s approval rating has sunk below 50 percent. When that happens just before a midterm election, the president’s party loses a historical average of 41 seats. As it happens, Republicans need 40 to win back the House.
“There certainly are parallels” between 1994 and today, said Jay Newton-Small in Time, but there’s a key difference, too. Today, the Republicans lack “a clear, dynamic leader,” whereas in 1994, they had the charismatic Newt Gingrich, who created the Contract With America to “rally voter discontent.” Tea Party activists, meanwhile, may actually hurt Republicans this year by driving the party too far to the right to suit independent voters. Look at the Senate races in Kentucky and Florida, where Tea Party candidates Rand Paul and Marco Rubio are out-fundraising more moderate Republicans and may seize the party’s nomination.
Article continues belowThe Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.