Al-Awlaki: A U.S. citizen in the cross hairs
President Obama issued a presidential directive ordering the assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki, the U.S. citizen and radical Muslim cleric who was the al Qaida contact for Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan and for Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
President Obama has just ordered the assassination of an American citizen, said Scott Shane in The New York Times. The target of this extraordinary presidential directive is Anwar al-Awlaki, a radical Muslim cleric who was born in New Mexico and spent years in the U.S. before relocating to Yemen. Al-Awlaki allegedly served as an al Qaida contact for Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who is accused of killing 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, last November, and for Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the Nigerian underwear bomber charged with trying to blow up a Detroit-bound plane on Christmas Day. U.S. officials say that al-Awlaki’s role in al Qaida has evolved from inciting violence against Americans to plotting actual attacks. But although the government maintains a list of terrorists authorized to be killed, “it is extremely rare, if not unprecedented,” for an American citizen to be on it.
So much for the U.S. Constitution, said Dale McFeatters in ScrippsNews.com. Since al-Awlaki is a U.S. citizen, the bull’s-eye on his back had to be approved by the National Security Council. But the Constitution unambiguously maintains “that no American shall be deprived of life without due process of law.” Are we to believe that “secret deliberations by the NSC” meet that constitutional standard? Even as a conservative, I find this order worrisome, said Kevin D. Williamson in National Review Online. It’s not impossible to imagine a U.S. president deciding that a journalist who’s obtained classified information needs to be “assassinated in the name of national security.” Al-Awlaki may be a very bad guy, but “this seems to me to be setting an awful and reckless precedent.” Sadly, said Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com, Americans are too enfeebled by fear to object. Like President Bush, Obama now claims that he need only label someone a “terrorist” to justify killing them “on sight.”
Al-Awlaki’s U.S. citizenship is irrelevant, said David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey in TheDailyBeast.com. As a member of al Qaida, al-Awlaki has joined in “armed hostilities” against the U.S. That makes him a soldier—not a “criminal suspect”—and under a well-established body of law, he is “subject to attack, capture, and detention pursuant to the law of armed conflict.” It’s time for Obama’s “disappointed supporters” to acknowledge the reality he accepted when he moved into the White House: We are at war.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Embrace the Boricua spirit on a foodie tour of Puerto RicoThe Week Recommends From cultural food tours to organic farms, there is plenty to discover around the island
-
The longest US government shutdown in historyThe Explainer Federal employees and low-income households have been particularly affected by ‘partisan standoffs’ in Washington
-
Jeremy Hunt picks his favourite booksThe Week Recommends The former chancellor shares works by Mishal Husain, Keach Hagey, and Johan Norberg
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration