Obama's nuclear gamble
The president is offering $8 billion to build the first nuclear reactors in a generation. Is he right to re-think atom power?
President Obama announced Tuesday that his administration would provide an $8.3 billion loan guarantee for two nuclear reactors planned in Georgia. The reactors will be the first built in the U.S. since the Three Mile Island accident in 1979, and Obama said the fresh investment in nuclear energy is "a necessary step" toward reducing America's dependence on fossil fuels. But environmentalists remain skeptical about the safety of nuclear power and the problem of waste disposal. Will Obama's nuclear bet pay off? (Watch a report about Obama's nuclear power plan)
No. Obama will regret going nuclear: Obama's nuclear power strategy is "bound to fail," says Amy Goodman in Truthdig. Wind and solar are more cost-effective ways to fight global warming -- without the nuclear waste nightmare. The industry only needs government loan guarantees because banks won't touch these costly, dangerous monstrosities.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The president's making a smart wager: New reactors are far safer than those built before the industry went into "hibernation" 30 years ago, says The Business Insider. There's no danger of a Chernobyl-style meltdown. Only 20 percent of our power is nuclear -- compared to 85 percent in France -- we can't afford not to go nuclear.
"Obama just went nuclear, and so should you"
The power industry needs less regulation, not handouts: If Obama really wants to jumpstart nuclear power, say the editors of National Review, he'll simplify the "arduous" permitting process. Two reactors are a drop in the bucket -- Obama's economic plan calls for 100. So this loan guarantee amounts to "billions of dollars in green pork that will do little to meet America’s energy needs."
Obama deserves credit for taking the risk: With all the political and regulatory obstacles, says Samuel Thernstrom in The New York Times, there's a real risk of default on these loans. Still, Obama's making a worthwhile gamble. Nuclear power is "no silver bullet" for our energy problems, but it's "an essential part of the puzzle."
"The greatest danger is financial"
..........................................
SEE COVERAGE OF THE NUCLEAR DEBATE FROM THE WEEK:
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
A running list of RFK Jr.'s controversies
In Depth The man atop the Department of Health and Human Services has had no shortage of scandals over the years
By Brigid Kennedy
-
Film reviews: Sinners and The King of Kings
Feature Vampires lay siege to a Mississippi juke joint and an animated retelling of Jesus' life
By The Week US
-
Music reviews: Bon Iver, Valerie June, and The Waterboys
Feature "Sable, Fable," "Owls, Omens, and Oracles," "Life, Death, and Dennis Hopper"
By The Week US
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK