Should Obama fire Napolitano?
The near-bombing of Flight 253, and Janet Napolitano's clumsy response, has some critics calling for a new DHS chief
It's still unclear how "crotch-bomber" Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab smuggled explosives onto Flight 253, but Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano's first public statement on the failed attack — that "the system worked" — was clearly a mistake. Napolitano quickly walked that back, but not before critics from the left, right, and center pounced — some even calling for her to be fired. Given Napolitano's big gaffe, and the apparent security lapse in her TSA, should President Obama start looking for a new Homeland Security chief? (Watch a Fox report claiming Janet Napolitano is "unqualified" for her position)
Fire Napolitano, now: Napolitano's "annoying, maddening, and absurd" argument that "the system worked," says Jonah Goldberg in National Review, was "just about the dumbest thing she could say, on the merits and politically." If the Obama White House wants to show it's serious about airplane security, it needs to "start by firing this patently unqualified hack."
"Fire Napolitano"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Keep her — she's doing good work: Napolitano's "inconsequential three-word phrase" was admittedly "awkward," says Steve Benen in Washington Monthly. But the real issue isn't word choice; it's competence, and "by fair standards," Napolitano is "the best secretary DHS has had in its relatively short history." Besides, "if awkward phrasing is grounds for removal from high-ranking federal office, George W. Bush never would have made it through his first year."
Her response to this crisis was a bad sign: Finding the right words to reassure us that the skies are safe is part of Napolitano's job, says Karen Tumulty in Time, and her "boneheaded assertion that the 'system worked'" doesn't inspire confidence in her "instincts and reflexes in a crisis." With her credibility in tatters, "it only seems fair to ask: Does the Obama Administration really have the right person in this very important and sensitive job?"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Napolitano, 1; Bush, 8: We get it: "Napolitano said something exceedingly stupid," says Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic. "But here's the problem with criticism of Napolitano — she's been on the job for less than a year," while the Bush Administration had nearly eight to fix the pre-9/11 air-travel security holes. If we need to point fingers, "there are better scapegoats out there than Janet Napolitano."
"In defense of Janet Napolitano"
........................................................
SEE THE WEEK'S LATEST COVERAGE OF FLIGHT 253:
• Flight 253: Who is to blame?
• Who is Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab?
• World newspapers reaction to attempted Northwest Airlines bombing
-
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published