Dick Cheney for president in 2012?
What the former vice president's return to the national stage says about his political future
"Don't start building that reinforced-concrete bomb shelter just yet," said Max Fisher in The Atlantic. The chatter you hear about former vice president Dick Cheney running for president in 2012 is "probably not serious." As columnist Jonah Goldberg says, Cheney remains a "beacon for conservatives," and he's enjoying a "resurgence on the national stage" as a critic of President Obama, but Cheney's unfavorable ratings suggest he'd have little hope at the polls.
Public opinion can change quickly, said James Taranto in The Wall Street Journal. Dick Cheney's main beef with Obama is that he's dismantling national security policies that kept the country safe for more than seven years after 9/11. If, heaven forbid, there's another terrorist attack on U.S. soil, Obama will be seen as a failure and Bush will be vindicated. In that scenario, "it's hard to think of a better candidate" than Cheney.
Granted, Dick Cheney's approval ratings are up "since he started going toe to toe with Obama on national security," said Allahpundit in Hot Air. But do Republicans really want to place their bets on Cheney over, say, Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee? Nominating the former vice president would make the 2012 election a referendum on the Bush years, "which is just about the only way to fire up the liberal base enough to turn out in droves in 2012."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
James Taranto is clearly living in an "alternate reality," said Steve Benen in Washington Monthly. It's "crazy" to suggest that the Obama administration isn't taking the terrorist threat seriously, and it's just plain wrong to claim that Bush and Cheney were "effective in fighting terrorism." But this shows that there are conservatives out there who "will want to tear this country apart" if there's another attack on American soil.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration

