Israel: Obama’s tough new stance
President Obama's first step toward establishing peace in the Middle East is to ask Israel to halt all further settlement in the occupied West Bank.
President Obama really believes he can create peace in the Mideast, said Dan Froomkin in TheWashingtonpost.com. His first step toward that goal, it’s now clear, is “to play hardball with Israel.” At his meeting last week with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Obama reiterated what he recently told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: Israel must stop building settlements in the occupied West Bank. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chimed in, calling for a “stop to settlements—not some settlements, not outposts, not natural growth exceptions.” By convincing “key pro-Israel allies in Congress” that halting settlements is essential to any peace plan, said Laura Rozen in Foreignpolicy.com, Obama has put Netanyahu in a corner. To one aide Netanyahu groused, “What the hell do they want from me?”
Friends of Israel deserve an honest answer, said Martin Peretz in The New Republic Online. Obama apparently thinks that if our closest Middle East ally halts all construction in the settlements—no new homes for settlers’ grown-up children, no additions to existing houses—then the Palestinian problem will magically disappear. That, of course, is nonsense. “The Palestinians haven’t shown any serious readiness to make peace.” Yet Obama would have Israel give up a major bargaining chip in return for—well, nothing. It’s worse than that, said Dick Morris in Townhall.com. Israeli sources say Obama recently sent CIA chief Leon Panetta to Tel Aviv to “read the riot act” regarding a possible Israeli pre-emptive strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Obama has essentially accepted that Iran will get the bomb, while demanding concessions from Israel and appeasing its many Arab enemies. Even the “sunshine Jewish patriots who voted for Obama” must now realize they’ve made a terrible mistake.
Obama means well, said Jim Hoagland in The Washington Post, but he is going about reviving the peace process the wrong way. He and his aides think that if the U.S. acts “forcefully enough,” it can compel Israel to end the settlements, take that prize to the Arab world, and quickly forge a breakthrough. But American arm-twisting alone won’t produce a Palestinian state. This is a time for patient diplomacy—for “pulling weeds and planting seeds,” and getting Israelis, Palestinians, and Arab nations to the peace table—not a time for hubris and demands. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, Mr. President, but “there is no American solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict that you can heroically deliver from on high.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published