Surveillance: The conservative backlash
Congressional Republicans and other conservatives reacted with outrage when the Department of Homeland Security distributed an intelligence report on the danger of right-wing extremist groups.
Guess who’s now complaining about intrusive government surveillance of potential terrorists? said Greg Miller in the Chicago Tribune. It’s not Muslims. It’s not liberals. It’s conservatives. The Department of Homeland Security has distributed an intelligence assessment to local law-enforcement officials warning of a “resurgence of right-wing extremist groups” in response to the election of an African-American president. The report specifically warns that “disgruntled military veterans” returning from Iraq and Afghanistan might be recruited by these hate groups to “carry out violence,” citing Timothy McVeigh, the anti-government Gulf War veteran who was convicted of killing 168 in the Oklahoma City bombing. When that report surfaced on the Internet, congressional Republicans and many other conservatives reacted with outrage, accusing the Obama administration of demonizing the Right and stereotyping military veterans as seething, traumatized psychopaths.
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the vast, right-wing conspiracy is back, said Jonah Goldberg in National Review Online. The report’s premise is that “the Right is full of whack-jobs, hatemongers, and killers, and if we don’t remain vigilant, bad things will happen.” The only trouble is that there’s no real evidence to support this “nakedly ideological” slander. The report claims that 19 recent war vets have joined the “extremist movement”—that, out of 1.4 million who’ve served in Iraq and Afghanistan. Clearly, the report’s real purpose is to “delegitimize” opposition to White House policies, said the Orange County, Calif., Register in an editorial. By specifically pointing an accusing finger at groups that support gun rights and oppose abortion and immigration, Obama’s Department of Homeland Security is conflating “legitimate dissent” with “dangerous activity.”
Gee, if you have nothing to hide, why all the paranoia? asked Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com. That’s what conservatives said when civil libertarians railed against the Bush administration’s insistence that it could “eavesdrop on telephone calls and read the e-mails of American citizens without warrants.” Thanks to the Right’s vigorous support, federal agencies routinely engaged in domestic spying not only on Muslims but on environmentalists, animal-rights activists, and anti-war groups. But now these authoritarians have “suddenly rediscovered their fear of the federal government.” It’s a bit late for that, isn’t it? “When you cheer on a Surveillance State, you have no grounds to complain when it turns its eyes on you.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Democrats seek 2026 inspiration from special election routsIN THE SPOTLIGHT High-profile wins are helping a party demoralized by Trump’s reelection regain momentum
-
Film reviews: ‘Bugonia,’ ‘The Mastermind,’ and ‘Nouvelle Vague’feature A kidnapped CEO might only appear to be human, an amateurish art heist goes sideways, and Jean-Luc Godard’s ‘Breathless’ gets a lively homage
-
‘Not all news is bad’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration