Surveillance: The conservative backlash
Congressional Republicans and other conservatives reacted with outrage when the Department of Homeland Security distributed an intelligence report on the danger of right-wing extremist groups.
Guess who’s now complaining about intrusive government surveillance of potential terrorists? said Greg Miller in the Chicago Tribune. It’s not Muslims. It’s not liberals. It’s conservatives. The Department of Homeland Security has distributed an intelligence assessment to local law-enforcement officials warning of a “resurgence of right-wing extremist groups” in response to the election of an African-American president. The report specifically warns that “disgruntled military veterans” returning from Iraq and Afghanistan might be recruited by these hate groups to “carry out violence,” citing Timothy McVeigh, the anti-government Gulf War veteran who was convicted of killing 168 in the Oklahoma City bombing. When that report surfaced on the Internet, congressional Republicans and many other conservatives reacted with outrage, accusing the Obama administration of demonizing the Right and stereotyping military veterans as seething, traumatized psychopaths.
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the vast, right-wing conspiracy is back, said Jonah Goldberg in National Review Online. The report’s premise is that “the Right is full of whack-jobs, hatemongers, and killers, and if we don’t remain vigilant, bad things will happen.” The only trouble is that there’s no real evidence to support this “nakedly ideological” slander. The report claims that 19 recent war vets have joined the “extremist movement”—that, out of 1.4 million who’ve served in Iraq and Afghanistan. Clearly, the report’s real purpose is to “delegitimize” opposition to White House policies, said the Orange County, Calif., Register in an editorial. By specifically pointing an accusing finger at groups that support gun rights and oppose abortion and immigration, Obama’s Department of Homeland Security is conflating “legitimate dissent” with “dangerous activity.”
Gee, if you have nothing to hide, why all the paranoia? asked Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com. That’s what conservatives said when civil libertarians railed against the Bush administration’s insistence that it could “eavesdrop on telephone calls and read the e-mails of American citizens without warrants.” Thanks to the Right’s vigorous support, federal agencies routinely engaged in domestic spying not only on Muslims but on environmentalists, animal-rights activists, and anti-war groups. But now these authoritarians have “suddenly rediscovered their fear of the federal government.” It’s a bit late for that, isn’t it? “When you cheer on a Surveillance State, you have no grounds to complain when it turns its eyes on you.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published