Civil liberties: Obama’s flip-flop
During the presidential campaign, Obama said he would end the “dark side” policies that President Bush instituted in his war on terror, but since the inauguration the new president and his staff have been carving
Barack Obama’s “civil-liberties honeymoon” is already over, said Eli Lake in The New Republic. During last year’s campaign, Obama repeatedly promised to end the “dark side” policies that President Bush instituted in his war on terror. Since the inauguration, however, the new president and his staff have been quietly carving out some “wiggle room.” Administration officials are admitting that although Guantánamo Bay is to be closed, dozens of dangerous prisoners will simply be moved to other jails, without any hope of a trial. While U.S. interrogators are once again bound by the Geneva Conventions, Obama has commissioned a study into whether harsher interrogation techniques may occasionally be justified for “high-value detainees” with specific knowledge of ongoing plots. Perhaps most surprisingly, administration lawyers last week asked a judge to dismiss a lawsuit by Guantánamo detainee Binyam Mohammed, who claims he was kidnapped by the U.S. and tortured in Egypt, on the dubious grounds that a trial might reveal “state secrets.”
What a relief, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. We were worried that the new president might actually follow through on his campaign promises to, in essence, “disarm the country’s counterterrorism arsenal” in the name of political correctness. Now that he’s in office, though, receiving the same chilling daily briefings as his predecessor, Obama has understandably found a new “anti-terror maturity,” and is quietly embracing the policies of a man he once seemed to think was “uniquely wicked.” It’s one thing to promise a cheering crowd of Democrats that you’ll reverse all Bush policies, said Nicholas Goldberg in the Los Angeles Times. But when you’re actually the president, and the CIA director begs you to keep certain information secret to protect American lives, “maybe it’s not quite so easy to say no.”
So once again, said Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com, we have a White House that says the ends justify the means. Invoking the State Secrets privilege is legitimate when your goal is to protect important intelligence information. But the Bush administration routinely used that privilege to legally block exposure of its torture of prisoners, its use of “black box” jails overseas, and its systematic abrogation of both the Constitution and the Geneva Conventions. For Obama to embrace this policy is “indefensible,” said The New York Times. Unless the president follows through on his pledge to make government transparent and accountable to the law, “voters have good reason to feel betrayed.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Trinidadian doubles recipe
The Week Recommends 'Dangerously addictive', this traditional Caribbean street food is the height of finger-licking goodness
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK
-
Labour and the so-called 'banter ban'
Talking Point Critics are claiming that a clause in the new Employment Rights Bill will spell the end of free-flowing pub conversation
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK
-
Andor series two: a 'perfect' Star Wars show
The Week Recommends Second instalment of Tony Gilroy's 'compelling' spin-off is a triumph
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK