Civil liberties: Obama’s flip-flop
During the presidential campaign, Obama said he would end the “dark side” policies that President Bush instituted in his war on terror, but since the inauguration the new president and his staff have been carving
Barack Obama’s “civil-liberties honeymoon” is already over, said Eli Lake in The New Republic. During last year’s campaign, Obama repeatedly promised to end the “dark side” policies that President Bush instituted in his war on terror. Since the inauguration, however, the new president and his staff have been quietly carving out some “wiggle room.” Administration officials are admitting that although Guantánamo Bay is to be closed, dozens of dangerous prisoners will simply be moved to other jails, without any hope of a trial. While U.S. interrogators are once again bound by the Geneva Conventions, Obama has commissioned a study into whether harsher interrogation techniques may occasionally be justified for “high-value detainees” with specific knowledge of ongoing plots. Perhaps most surprisingly, administration lawyers last week asked a judge to dismiss a lawsuit by Guantánamo detainee Binyam Mohammed, who claims he was kidnapped by the U.S. and tortured in Egypt, on the dubious grounds that a trial might reveal “state secrets.”
What a relief, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. We were worried that the new president might actually follow through on his campaign promises to, in essence, “disarm the country’s counterterrorism arsenal” in the name of political correctness. Now that he’s in office, though, receiving the same chilling daily briefings as his predecessor, Obama has understandably found a new “anti-terror maturity,” and is quietly embracing the policies of a man he once seemed to think was “uniquely wicked.” It’s one thing to promise a cheering crowd of Democrats that you’ll reverse all Bush policies, said Nicholas Goldberg in the Los Angeles Times. But when you’re actually the president, and the CIA director begs you to keep certain information secret to protect American lives, “maybe it’s not quite so easy to say no.”
So once again, said Glenn Greenwald in Salon.com, we have a White House that says the ends justify the means. Invoking the State Secrets privilege is legitimate when your goal is to protect important intelligence information. But the Bush administration routinely used that privilege to legally block exposure of its torture of prisoners, its use of “black box” jails overseas, and its systematic abrogation of both the Constitution and the Geneva Conventions. For Obama to embrace this policy is “indefensible,” said The New York Times. Unless the president follows through on his pledge to make government transparent and accountable to the law, “voters have good reason to feel betrayed.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'New dawn' as Māori queen is crowned
In The Spotlight Ngā Wai Hono i te Pō's ascent to the throne comes at a thorny moment for New Zealand's indigenous community
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Keir Starmer defends winter fuel cut
Speed Read PM says government must 'fix the foundations' despite criticism
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
'Cold, hard clash'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
A brief history of third parties in the US
In Depth Though none of America's third parties have won a presidential election, they have nonetheless had a large impact on the country's politics
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published