Issue of the week: The return of protectionism
As the global economic meltdown spreads, many governments are once again flirting with protectionism.
As the global economic meltdown spreads, many governments are once again flirting with protectionism. But it’s shaping up so far as “a gentler kind of trade war,” said Anthony Faiola in The Washington Post—at least compared with the worldwide “protectionist battle” of the 1930s. During the Great Depression, the U.S. Congress passed a “Buy American” bill that barred imports of 20,000 types of goods, from French dresses to Argentine butter. Other nations retaliated in kind, paralyzing international trade and prolonging the Depression. In the aftermath of that catastrophe, the world’s biggest trading nations created rules against across-the-board trade barriers. But those rules leave “a surprising amount of wiggle room” for countries to engage in a “subtle form of protectionism.” Congress is now exploiting those loopholes, said Ron Scherer in The Christian Science Monitor. Most notably, lawmakers from steel-producing states have added language to the stimulus bill that bars the use of imported iron and steel in new infrastructure projects. The U.S. is far from unique. “At least 33 other nations” have launched stimulus programs of their own, and many include protections for domestic industry.
What did lawmakers expect? asked The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. “Congress is signaling to the rest of the world that U.S. protectionists are in charge” of the stimulus program, and that other countries must defend themselves. They will inevitably retaliate, locking “American companies out of the bidding on their projects.” That will hurt U.S. companies such as Caterpillar and General Electric, which want a piece of infrastructure projects in China and other countries. “Congress must want more Caterpillar layoffs.”
No, Congress wants to create jobs in the U.S., not in China or India, said John Judis in The New Republic. Let’s say the U.S. spends $500 million on the steel needed to repair bridges and buildings. If the U.S. were to spend that money on steel from China, it would stimulate China’s economy but do nothing for our own. But if government spending puts American steelworkers back to work, that will help revive the American economy, and the rest of the world will eventually benefit. The current Buy American provision is meant to ensure that all this spending “doesn’t
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
simply disappear in a flood of imports.”
Other nations, though, see it as a blatant act of protectionism, said Dave Schuler in the online policy journal Outsidethebeltway
.com. “Some of our trading partners are just itching to put protectionist measures of their own into place.” Since these measures will hurt many struggling U.S. industries, “let’s not give them the excuse.” President Obama can’t resist the protectionist tide all by himself, said Bob Davis in The Wall Street Journal. The leaders of the world’s economic powers can stem the rise of economic nationalism only by acting in concert. “That will provide some political cover at home for governments that keep their markets open.” Only the U.S., the world’s largest economy, can lead the world out of the economic crisis. But it needs a thriving—and open—global marketplace in order to accomplish that.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Today's political cartoons - September 14, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - a second debate, Europe on the menu, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 cleverly clashing cartoons about the presidential debate
Cartoons Artists take on a deepfake debate, winners and losers, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The Pélicot case: a horror exposed
Talking Point This case is unusually horrifying, but the misogyny that enabled is chillingly common
By The Week UK Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published