Torture: Obama’s gray new reality
How will Obama make a clean break with the Bush administration's policies on interrogation and the use of torture?
Dick Cheney in shackles? Don’t hold your breath, said William Kristol in The New York Times. The president-elect this week dashed the hopes of those rabid liberals who want to see Bush administration officials prosecuted for their supposed “war crimes” in the wake of 9/11. In an ABC interview, Barack Obama made it clear he wouldn’t pursue criminal investigations of Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program or the use of torture on terrorist detainees, saying, “We need to look forward as opposed to looking backwards.” This was reassuring news, said William McGurn in The Wall Street Journal, as was Obama’s comment that shutting down the U.S. detention camp at Guantánamo Bay would be “more difficult than I think a lot of people realize” and might take up to a year. Now that the responsibility for preventing another 9/11 is on Obama’s shoulders, he’s clearly not so anxious to toss all Bush-Cheney policies in the wastebasket.
In fact, Obama may find himself continuing some of those policies, said Stuart Taylor Jr. and Evan Thomas in Newsweek. But that doesn’t mean he has to copy the Bush administration’s arrogant, secretive style. Rather than asking Congress to authorize new wiretapping rules or interrogation techniques, Bush and Cheney always preferred to say nothing and use executive orders and in-house legal rulings to create new policy. Obama will have many of the same “thorny issues” to deal with, such as what to do with the real al Qaida operatives currently in U.S. custody and where to draw the line between tough interrogation methods and torture. To make a clean break with this administration, though, Obama has to “level with the American people about what he is doing to protect their liberties—while keeping them safe.”
That’s a cop-out, not a compromise, said Christopher Hayes in TheNation.com. The notion that national security requires real men to do things they’re not proud of is the same one Bush and Cheney have been pushing since 9/11, and unless Obama rejects it entirely, our reputation as a nation of torturers may become permanent. To erase that stain, Obama need not get Cheney thrown in prison, said Joe Klein in Time. But there does need to be “some official acknowledgement” that the previous administration engaged in actions that were “reprehensible, and quite possibly illegal.” It’s not enough for Obama to quietly retire the brutal policies of his predecessor. The world needs to hear, loud and clear, “that the U.S. is no longer in the torture business.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
DVT: what to know about the blood clot plaguing NBA players
The Explainer Multiple players have been diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis over the past few months
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Is Elon Musk's DOGE job coming to an end?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Plummeting popularity, a stinging electoral defeat, and Tesla's shrinking market share could be pulling the tech billionaire out of Trump's presidential orbit
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
What does Health and Human Services do?
The Explainer Cuts will 'dramatically alter' public health in America
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published