A terror strike stuns Pakistan
The bombing of the Islamabad Marriott by Islamic militants came shortly after President Asif Ali Zardari and his Cabinet had been scheduled to be at the hotel. Officials speculated that they were the targets.
Pakistan’s Islamic militants raised the stakes in their conflict with the country’s new government last week as massive suicide truck bomb ripped through a luxury hotel in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad, killing 53 and injuring more than 250. The bombing of the Marriott Hotel came shortly after newly elected President Asif Ali Zardari and his Cabinet had been scheduled to be at the hotel, and officials speculated that they were the targets. In the days following the attack, gunmen kidnapped the top Afghan diplomat in Pakistan, and a suicide bombing killed nine police officers north of the capital.
Officials said the spate of attacks was likely the work of al Qaida and the Taliban, possibly in response to government offensives in the tribal regions near Afghanistan. Pakistani troops said they fired on U.S. personnel who had crossed the border in pursuit of militants—a claim the U.S. denied. At the U.N. this week, Zardari met with President Bush and said Pakistan would accept U.S. assistance, but not interference. “Give us the intelligence and we will do the job,” he said.
Pakistan is facing “a critical test,” said Ismail Khan and Carlotta Gall in The New York Times. By killing so many Pakistanis in the heart of the country, the Islamic extremists have made clear their goal is not to fight Americans in Afghanistan but to topple the Pakistani government. In the past, Pakistan has responded to terrorism by negotiating cease-fires, a strategy that has only “left the militants stronger.” Now officials say they are determined to annihilate the militant threat on the battlefield.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The best thing the U.S. can do, said Robert Baer in Time.com, is get out of Pakistan’s way. America’s recent moves along the Afghanistan border are a violation of Pakistani sovereignty; they are radicalizing the population and making it hard for the fledgling government to wage its own battles. Pakistan could be on the verge of civil war. “Should we be adding to the force of chaos?”
The problem with America’s cross-border raids, said Steve Coll in Newyorker.com, is that military action makes sense only as a small component of a coherent political approach. Our incursions wouldn’t ruffle so many feathers if we also had a plan for nurturing “a stable, democratic, modernizing Pakistan at peace with its neighbors.” Developing one must be a top priority of the next American president.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Brazil has a scorpion problem
Under The Radar Venomous arachnids are infesting country's fast-growing cities
-
Why Rikers Island will no longer be under New York City's control
The Explainer A 'remediation manager' has been appointed to run the infamous jail
-
California may pull health care from eligible undocumented migrants
IN THE SPOTLIGHT After pushing for universal health care for all Californians regardless of immigration status, Gov. Gavin Newsom's latest budget proposal backs away from a key campaign promise
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy