The verdict on military tribunals

What Salim Hamdan's sentence says about terrorism trials.

“The Bush team got its wish,” said the San Francisco Chronicle in an editorial. With the conviction of Salim Hamdan, who was once Osama bin Laden’s driver, the administration has its first conviction “in a military court of a terrorist grabbed on the Afghan battlefield five years ago.” But the “near wrist-slap sentence of six additional months in the Guantanamo brig” made for a “muddled ending” that won’t end the controversy over the Pentagon’s process for handling terror suspects.

Hamdan’s trial was “neither a model of justice nor a kangaroo court,” said USA Today in an editorial. But the independence of the judge and jurors, along with the reasonable sentence Hamdan received, proved that civil libertarians were wrong to say that the military commissions would “rubber stamp” anything the prosecutors wanted. That alone was a “triumph.”

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us