Hamas says it can live with Israel
After an extraordinary meeting with former President Jimmy Carter, the militant Islamic group Hamas said for the first time this week that it would be willing to abide by a two-state peace agreement with Israel. Carter, who met with the group despite cond
After an extraordinary meeting with former President Jimmy Carter, the militant Islamic group Hamas said for the first time this week that it would be willing to abide by a two-state peace agreement with Israel. Carter, who met with the group despite condemnation from the Bush administration and Israel, said Hamas had essentially backed down from its longstanding goal of destroying Israel. “It may be something they wish,” Carter said, “but they know it’s a fruitless concept.” Israeli officials said the entire episode was a propaganda ploy. “It was sad to see how Hamas is using former President Carter to try to get legitimization it does not deserve,” said Foreign Ministry spokesman Arye Mekel.
Carter’s freelance diplomacy occurred against a backdrop of renewed fighting in Hamas-controlled Gaza, which left three Israeli soldiers and 21 Palestinians dead last week. Egypt is mediating between the two sides in an effort to stop the fighting and secure the release of prisoners. Hamas said it would agree to a cease-fire in Gaza, dropping its previous condition of a simultaneous truce in the West Bank. Israel’s defense minister said Hamas was merely seeking a pause in order to re-arm.
Jimmy Carter is rapidly becoming “America’s most embarrassing ex-somebody,” said Robert Satloff in the Los Angeles Times. Hamas’ “concession” on Israel’s right to exist is meaningless; it requires a vote by all Palestinians worldwide, which would be virtually impossible to orchestrate. All Carter has done is set a precedent for “dangerous and desperate initiatives” to bring Hamas into official Mideast peace talks. Israel’s and America’s current policy of strengthening moderate Palestinians while freezing out Hamas and other terrorist groups remains the best approach.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Carter’s willingness to engage with Hamas is hardly as extreme as it might appear, said Marc Perelman in the Forward. According to one recent poll, 64 percent of Israelis believe their government should, in fact, negotiate directly with Hamas. Prominent proponents of this idea “come from all sides of the Israeli political spectrum.” Doves believe Hamas can be persuaded to embrace peace, while hawks think Hamas and Israel have a mutual interest in “managing the conflict.”
Pragmatic engagement may be necessary, said The Boston Globe in an editorial, but Carter’s showy embrace of Hamas does more harm than good. “His actions carry the prestige of a former president” and raise Hamas’ stature accordingly. That will only make it harder to get any real concessions out of a group that, as Carter himself admitted, still prefers to see Israel wiped off the map.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How to create a healthy 'germier' home
Under The Radar Exposure to a broad range of microbes can enhance our immune system, especially during childhood
-
George Floyd: Did Black Lives Matter fail?
Feature The momentum for change fades as the Black Lives Matter Plaza is scrubbed clean
-
National debt: Why Congress no longer cares
Feature Rising interest rates, tariffs and Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill could sent the national debt soaring
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy