Would a recount save Kenya?

Kenyan police fired teargas at crowds as post-election violence spread. If President Mwai Kibaki cares about his country, said The New York Times, he'll renounce the disputed results that gave him a second term. "Maybe, just maybe," Kibaki won f

What happened

Kenyan police fired teargas and water cannons at protesters on Thursday as crowds continued to vent their anger over President Mwai Kibaki’s disputed re-election. “This is dictatorship now,” one protester shouted. (The Washington Post, free registration)

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

“Maybe, just maybe,” Kibaki legitimately won re-election, said The Boston Globe in an editorial (free registration). But the only way to stop the violence is a thorough, honest recount “without the corruption and tribalism that have marked Kenyan politics since independence in 1963.” Kibaki has presided over “peaceful economic growth” and helped the U.S. fight terrorism—he mustn’t let a “tainted” election destroy five years of progress.

“Kenya isn’t supposed to be like this,” said Michela Wong in the British current-affairs magazine New Statesman. It has long been one of the “most stable democracies” in Africa—the only place safe enough to host several United Nations agencies. But the electoral contest between “Kibaki and the feisty opposition leader Raila Odinga, the closest in Kenyan history, has exposed an ethnic fissure whose depth was no secret to ordinary Kenyans.”