Bush loses a friend
Australian voters dumped Prime Minister John Howard because they wanted change, said E.J. Dionne in The Washington Post. There's a lesson there for Democrats in the U.S. Australia's "pro-American disposition" will survive, said the National Revi
What happened
Australia’s outgoing prime minister, John Howard, began clearing out his office on Monday after his center-right coalition was trounced by the Labor Party in weekend parliamentary elections. (Melbourne, Australia, Herald Sun) Howard had been a staunch ally of President Bush, and his replacement, Kevin Rudd, is expected to change his country’s policies by pushing for the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol on global warming and the withdrawal of Australia’s 550 troops in Iraq. (The New York Times, free registration)
What the commentators said
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The change in Australia “holds lessons for Democrats” in the U.S., said E.J. Dionne in The Washington Post (free registration). Rudd, 50, won a mandate for change—even though the 58-year-old Howard “presided over record prosperity”—by casting the election as a chance to “move beyond the tired “ideological categories of the past” and “end a long conservative era. Sound familiar?”
“For America this change is tinged with regret,” said National Review Online in an editorial. “Howard was an usually generous and outspoken ally.” But Rudd won’t abandon his country’s “pro-American disposition.” He only won by “soothing away fears” among voters who still respect Howard that “his government would be a change too far.”
Howard’s big problems was that he was “seen as out of touch on environmental issues,” said The Seattle Times in an editorial. Rudd’s promise to ratify the Kyoto Protocol showed that he recognized the need to do something. Voters “were motivated by a government report that said spending a bit more now on controlling emissions would avoid making much-larger investments later.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Departure(s): Julian Barnes’ ‘triumphant’ final book blends fact with fictionThe Week Recommends The Booker prize-winning novelist ponders the ‘struggle to find happiness and accept life’s ending’
-
7 lively travel games for adultsThe Week Recommends Game on!
-
Why is the Pentagon taking over the military’s independent newspaper?Today’s Big Question Stars and Stripes is published by the Defense Department but is editorially independent
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred