Home
Politics

Are debates worth the time?

Candidates often clash and always clamor for attention at the presidentail debates, said David Broder in The Washington Post, but "voters deserve better." Democratic candidates could make their gabfests more enlightening, said Michael Goodwin in

Newsletter sign up Newsletter

By The Week Staff

last updated 8 January 2015

What happened

The most recent Democratic presidential campaign debate continued to make headlines over the weekend, with front-runner Hillary Clinton’s staff insisting she won and a college student who asked Clinton “diamonds or pearls” insisting that CNN made her pose the question. (Reuters)

What the commentators said

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

“Voters deserve better,” said David S. Broder in The Washington Post (free registration). Both parties’ pre-primary debates have become an “exercise in theatrical artificiality rather than substance.” We never get to hear “the implications” of any of the candidates’ positions, because everyone’s just clamoring to get noticed.

Last week, it was CNN that chose "entertainment over substance," said Larry Parrish and Edie Butler in The Boston Globe (free registration). From the opening "cattle call of candidates" to the "last, frivolous question" about jewelry—handpicked by CNN—"the debate felt more like a pumped-up sports event than a debate among presidential candidates."

Don’t blame the viewers, or the people who hold the debates, said Michael Goodwin in the New York Daily News (free registration). “It's the Democratic presidential candidates who are sleepwalking through history.” At last week’s gabfest, not one candidate mentioned “homeland security” or the “war on terror.”

“Too much of anything dulls the senses,” said Karen Heller in the Detroit Free Press (free registration). Maybe we’d all get more useful information if the candidates spent their time out talking to actual voters. “Forty-six debates in 40 weeks is too much for a country and its candidates to endure.”

Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox

A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com

Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors

By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

The Week Staff

Social Links Navigation

Latest

Quirky hot cross buns to try this Easter
The Week Recommends Creative, flavourful twists on the classic Easter bake, from tiramisu and stem ginger to a cheesy sharing-size treat

By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published 31 March 25
What should you be stockpiling for 'World War Three'?
In the Spotlight Britons advised to prepare after the EU tells its citizens to have an emergency kit just in case

By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published 31 March 25
Carnivore diet: why people are eating only meat
The Explainer 'Meatfluencers' are taking social media by storm but experts warn meat-only diets have health consequences

By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published 31 March 25