Washington, D.C.
The Bush administration is considering sending a small invasion force straight for Saddam Hussein and his top commanders. By striking Baghdad first, The New York Times reported, the Pentagon believes it can destroy Iraq’s political and military leadership before it can fire chemical or biological weapons. Striking deep in Iraq would be risky, but would not require the 250,000 troops needed for a full invasion. Before mounting an attack, however, administration lawyers have concluded that the U.S. should clearly link Iraq to the al Qaida terrorist network, USA Today reported. Connecting Iraq to the Sept. 11 attacks, the attorneys said, would enable the U.S. to justify the campaign against Saddam to the international community.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Air strikes in the Caribbean: Trump’s murky narco-warTalking Point Drug cartels ‘don’t follow Marquess of Queensberry Rules’, but US military air strikes on speedboats rely on strained interpretation of ‘invasion’
-
A tour of Sri Lanka’s beautiful northThe Week Recommends ‘Less frenetic’ than the south, this region is full of beautiful wildlife, historical sites and resorts
-
Crossword: September 14, 2025The Week's daily crossword puzzle
