Immigration
Is a compromise possible?
Republicans are headed for disaster over the issue of immigration, said Fred Barnes in The Weekly Standard. The party's conservative base is demanding that President Bush and the GOP-controlled Congress do something about this nation's 12 million illegal aliens, and the millions of others who wish to cross over from Mexico. But 'œimpasse,' not action, is looming on Capitol Hill. The Senate appears likely to pass a compromise version of Bush's new immigration reform proposal. Bush's plan, unveiled last week, would dispatch 6,000 National Guardsmen to patrol the border and staunch the immigrant flow with high-tech fences in urban corridors—while also putting millions of illegals on track for legal status and citizenship. House Republican leaders, though, are insisting on taking a much harder line. Their bill calls for walling off 700 miles of the Mexican border, arresting as many illegals as the government can find, and deporting them. If Bush can't resolve this impasse, and no bill is passed, 'œit would mark the end of the Bush presidency as an effective political force.'
The chances for a compromise look bleak, said David Brooks in The New York Times. The 'œclose-the-border restrictionists' believe they're in the majority, and they're not backing down. Conservative talk-radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh—once a bulwark of Bush support—now pillory the president daily for seeking the middle ground. The right wing's rage at the president, in fact, is now as hysterical as the anti-war left's. Have the hard-liners lost their minds? 'œPerhaps they are punishing Bush for the sin of being unpopular.' Some of them are so angry that they object 'œeven when they get what they want,' said Jack Kelly in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. When Bush proposed cracking down on employers who hire illegals, the hotheads dismissed it as a token gesture.
In this case, timing was everything, said Tom Bevan in the Chicago Sun-Times. If Bush had come up with his plan early in his administration, many conservatives probably would have applauded. But after 'œsix years in office with a more or less status quo immigration policy, millions of immigrants have entered the country illegally on Bush's watch.' So now, conservative legislators 'œwould rather have no bill at all' than one with even a whiff of amnesty.
These legislators are absolutely right, said Charles Krauthammer in The Washington Post. Letting millions of uneducated and unskilled people simply stream into the U.S. creates gigantic social, economic, and security problems. Are conservatives alone in thinking that 'œunlimited, unregulated immigration' is a bad idea? Bush's plan to install a small number of National Guardsmen on the vast border will not stop the flow of illegals, and everyone knows it. Only a major barrier will do that. Until Bush and the Senate get serious about shutting off the flood of illegals, there can be no compromise.
Joe Klein
Time
-
The best folk albums of 2025
The Week Recommends From soul-searching lyrics to magnificent harmonies, these artists are a cut above the rest
-
Parthenogenesis: the miracle of 'virgin births' in the animal kingdom
The Explainer Asexual reproduction, in which females reproduce without males by cloning themselves, has been documented in multiple species
-
What will bring Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table?
Today's Big Question With diplomatic efforts stalling, the US and EU turn again to sanctions as Russian drone strikes on Poland risk dramatically escalating conflict
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardon
Talking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidents
The Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: which party are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event