Immigration
Is a compromise possible?
Republicans are headed for disaster over the issue of immigration, said Fred Barnes in The Weekly Standard. The party's conservative base is demanding that President Bush and the GOP-controlled Congress do something about this nation's 12 million illegal aliens, and the millions of others who wish to cross over from Mexico. But 'œimpasse,' not action, is looming on Capitol Hill. The Senate appears likely to pass a compromise version of Bush's new immigration reform proposal. Bush's plan, unveiled last week, would dispatch 6,000 National Guardsmen to patrol the border and staunch the immigrant flow with high-tech fences in urban corridors—while also putting millions of illegals on track for legal status and citizenship. House Republican leaders, though, are insisting on taking a much harder line. Their bill calls for walling off 700 miles of the Mexican border, arresting as many illegals as the government can find, and deporting them. If Bush can't resolve this impasse, and no bill is passed, 'œit would mark the end of the Bush presidency as an effective political force.'
The chances for a compromise look bleak, said David Brooks in The New York Times. The 'œclose-the-border restrictionists' believe they're in the majority, and they're not backing down. Conservative talk-radio hosts such as Rush Limbaugh—once a bulwark of Bush support—now pillory the president daily for seeking the middle ground. The right wing's rage at the president, in fact, is now as hysterical as the anti-war left's. Have the hard-liners lost their minds? 'œPerhaps they are punishing Bush for the sin of being unpopular.' Some of them are so angry that they object 'œeven when they get what they want,' said Jack Kelly in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. When Bush proposed cracking down on employers who hire illegals, the hotheads dismissed it as a token gesture.
In this case, timing was everything, said Tom Bevan in the Chicago Sun-Times. If Bush had come up with his plan early in his administration, many conservatives probably would have applauded. But after 'œsix years in office with a more or less status quo immigration policy, millions of immigrants have entered the country illegally on Bush's watch.' So now, conservative legislators 'œwould rather have no bill at all' than one with even a whiff of amnesty.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
These legislators are absolutely right, said Charles Krauthammer in The Washington Post. Letting millions of uneducated and unskilled people simply stream into the U.S. creates gigantic social, economic, and security problems. Are conservatives alone in thinking that 'œunlimited, unregulated immigration' is a bad idea? Bush's plan to install a small number of National Guardsmen on the vast border will not stop the flow of illegals, and everyone knows it. Only a major barrier will do that. Until Bush and the Senate get serious about shutting off the flood of illegals, there can be no compromise.
Joe Klein
Time
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
After Israel's brazen Iran attack, what's next for the region and the world?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Following decades of saber-rattling, Israel's aerial assault on Iranian military targets has pushed the Middle East to the brink of all-out war
-
7 touring theater productions that are out to bring the joy
The Week Recommends 'Hamilton' and 'Wicked' never die, and neither does ABBA
-
College grads are seeking their first jobs. Is AI in the way?
In The Spotlight Unemployment is rising for young professionals
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy