Opinion

Andrew Jackson was America's worst 'great' president

If you dislike what the presidency has become, blame Old Hickory

Andrew Jackson is one of America's "great" presidents. At least that's what the federal notes in my wallet and the annual Jefferson-Jackson fundraiser for the Democratic Party tell me. My high school history textbook catechized me on an "Age of Jackson" and the bold inauguration of "Jacksonian democracy."

I don't deny the bark-chewing, bloody-axe awe that his life story inspires. Jackson grew up in log-cabin Carolinian poverty, became an orphan during the Revolutionary War, and then rose into a kind of frontier aristocracy, making his fortune in Tennessee at the turn of the century. He was a plantation owner, who bought and sold slaves. He served in the House and briefly in the Senate.

Jackson was the embodied zenith of Southern Scots-Irish honor culture. When Charles Dickinson called him "a coward and equivocator," the spat evolved into a formal duel. The excellent marksman Dickinson chose pistols and broke two of Jackson's ribs with a quick first shot. Even though Jackson's ribs were shattered, honor compelled Dickinson to stay in his spot 24 feet in front of the future president. Old Hickory took his time — so much that others questioned his honor after the fact — steadied himself, and fired a fatal shot.

As commander and later major general of the Tennessee militia, he maneuvered himself into important theaters during the War of 1812. He crushed the Red Sticks at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend, thereby opening up more of the Mississippi Territory for American settlement. At the turn of the year, he inflicted a major defeat on the British at the Battle of New Orleans. After the war and with designs on the presidency, he hired a few biographers in succession to spread perhaps the most captivating story of his life: his capture by the British at age 14 during the Revolutionary War. The story goes that when he refused to clean the boots of a British soldier, he was beaten with a sword, receiving his facial scars.

But Jackson's sense of honor was far less about protecting a good reputation than instilling a fearsome one through terrible violence. He was a smoldering latrine fire of resentments and rage. And in many ways, quarrels about honor obsessed his presidency.

Jackson's life story seemed almost purpose-built for an American republic that had just adopted universal white male suffrage in 1820. His "defeat" in 1824 by means of the corrupt bargain, which had elevated popular-vote loser and Revolutionary scion John Quincy Adams, shaped his rage at "special privilege."

Jackson symbolized the up-from-nothing story of so many of his countrymen. But it was a tainted legacy. He was a slave-owner who bought and sold men in bulk. When one of his slaves showed the Jacksonian temerity to escape his master, Jackson offered a $50 reward "and $10 extra for every 100 lashes a person will give to the amount of 300" — basically a freelance death sentence. Part of Jackson's personal wealth came through land that he acquired even though it had been promised to Indians in a treaty. It's completely justified to say that Jacksonian democracy reflected this same grasping ambition of the newly expanded white voting classes at the expense of slaves and Indians.

As president, he reversed the alternately benign and malign neglect of Indian affairs by his predecessors and engaged in the forced removal of Indians from the South, culminating in the Trail of Tears. It's impossible to know whether Jacksonian rivals like the "Adams men" could have ever found policies that encouraged prosperous co-existence and even cooperation between natives and American whites. But Jackson's policies irreversibly doomed relations with these tribes, and their descendants still suffer from them today.

Besides the destruction of his rivals and the accumulation of personal power, it's hard to pin down Jackon's guiding principles. Was he a strict constructionist or a federal-power expansionist? He set himself to destroy the Second Bank of the United States in a Jeffersonian rage. And he vetoed development projects like the Maysville Road. But he also was fearsome in defending the prerogative of the federal government in tariff policy. When South Carolina began threatening secession, Jackson told a South Carolinian, "If a single drop of blood shall be shed there in opposition to the laws of the United States, I will hang the first man I can lay my hand on engaged in such treasonable conduct, upon the first tree I can reach."

Proponents of Jackson claim he broke up some networks of privilege among his rivals. That may be true — but it also entrenched amateurism in civil service and a new system of patronage politics (with their own unearned privileges) which would define American government for several generations. On the night of his inauguration, office-seekers so crowded the White House that the party devolved into a near riot. Jackson's purge of federal office-holders relied on a campaign of trumped-up and false charges against incumbents, especially in the Northeast where Jackson tried to build a base of political loyalty. This marauding style of patronage machine-building would live on for a century, most notably in the squalor of Kansas' Pendergast machine and New York's Tammany Hall.

John Quincy Adams saw the effect of Jackson's presidency on the republic with dread. He wrote:

The American Union as a moral Person in the family of Nations, is to live from hand to mouth, to cast away, instead of using for the improvement of its own condition, the bounties of Providence, and to raise to the summit of Power a succession of Presidents the consummation of whose glory will be to growl and snarl with impotent fury against a money broker's shop, to rivet into perpetuity the clanking chain of the Slave, and to waste in boundless bribery to the west the invaluable inheritance of the Public Lands. [Adams]

We often say that George Washington was a great president. That's wrong: He was a great man and a good president. Washington was good precisely because he refused to make himself a great president. His sculpted presence on a mountain in the Dakotas would be a source of bafflement and embarrassment to him.

Jackson was the first "great" president. Jackson's authoritarian will, his eagerness with the veto pen, his unprincipled use of federal power against non-whites, and his ugly patronage schemes changed forever the character of the Republic. Jackson pushed America's fragile Republican institutions down in front of the march of mass democracy. He put the executive branch on a tilt that eventually made it superior to Congress, and made the president himself into a kind of populist king and symbol of the people's will. The American nation has suffered from infantalized Congresses, cowardly judiciaries, and "great presidencies" ever since.

More From...

Picture of Michael Brendan DoughertyMichael Brendan Dougherty
Read All
What Andrew Jackson can teach us about Trump's overthrow of conservatism
President Trump
Opinion

What Andrew Jackson can teach us about Trump's overthrow of conservatism

I write on the internet. I'm sorry.
With regrets.
Opinion

I write on the internet. I'm sorry.

Why America should envy Brexit
Brexit envy.
Opinion

Why America should envy Brexit

Nationalists vs. the establishment: A disappointing clash
A precarious place.
Opinion

Nationalists vs. the establishment: A disappointing clash

Recommended

Stormy Daniels and the Trump hush-money case
Stormy Daniels.
Profile

Stormy Daniels and the Trump hush-money case

Indicting the 'Teflon president'
Two hands in cuffs, one giving a thumbs-up and the other giving a thumbs-down
Talking point

Indicting the 'Teflon president'

Do Republicans want to bomb Mexico?
Marjorie Taylor Greene speaks at CPAC
Behind the scenes

Do Republicans want to bomb Mexico?

DeSantis plays both sides in comments on a possible Trump indictment
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis
Talking point

DeSantis plays both sides in comments on a possible Trump indictment

Most Popular

Russia's spring Ukraine offensive may be winding down amid heavy losses
Ukrainian tank fires near Bakhmut
Attrition

Russia's spring Ukraine offensive may be winding down amid heavy losses

Adam Gopnik recommends 6 classic books for literature fans
Adam Gopnik.
Feature

Adam Gopnik recommends 6 classic books for literature fans

Nearly 200 banks at risk of SVB-type collapse, study finds
Bank ATM.
not fun to hear

Nearly 200 banks at risk of SVB-type collapse, study finds