Hillary Clinton and the left's New Isolationism
Don't expect Hillary to run as a hawk
In the presidential candidacy of Sen. Rand Paul, many globally-minded conservatives fear, the right's worst isolationist instincts have their best chance to take hold in the GOP and the country alike.
In thinking this way, conservatives comfortable with military interventionism are following a dangerous instinct. Because by far, the most potent and persuasive form of isolationism is not to be found on the right. Conservatives are so strongly inclined not to countenance the appeal of President Obama's foreign policy that they have become willfully ignorant of the New Isolationism ascendant on the left.
And in Hillary Clinton, this New Isolationism may have already found its greatest champion. If conservatives fail to apprehend the reason why, they face a much heavier lift in 2016 than they could possibly imagine. And from there on out, things could get a lot worse.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Liberal opposition to the war in Iraq was strong, and some far-left critics questioned the war in Afghanistan, too. But under Obama, progressive opposition to interventions short of full-dress invasion has basically disappeared. The anti-war left ain't what it used to be. And, as Peter Beinart recently suggested, that's caused a strange and stark reconfiguration of popular opinion on the mainstream left.
Beinart invites us to closely consider the substance and symbolism of Hillary Clinton's presidential announcement video. Although notable for its direct application of identity politics, it is even more striking for the balance it strikes between domestic and international issues. In fact, there is no balance at all; aggressively progressive domestic themes are paired with utter silence on what was supposed to be Clinton's greatest actual credential: foreign policy.
Of course, we shouldn't make too much of the video alone. Clinton will have ample opportunity to weigh in on the world as she forges through the campaign gauntlet.
Then again, why would she?
On the left today, the quest for social justice at home completely eclipses all other priorities. It's as if “We are the world" no longer expresses global solidarity but American preeminence. Here, the promise of our perfectible union takes on such an inspiringly outsized importance that the rest of the planet can recede into a troubled but very distant background.
Last time around, Clinton used her now-infamous "3 a.m. phone call" ad to question Barack Obama's aptitude in a dangerous world. How times have changed. Today, the Clinton brand stands for the power and privilege of isolating Americans themselves from America's interventions around the world. Sure, we might have to bomb this or that country into chaos. But from the standpoint of "Everyday Americans" thirsting for equal access to resources and recognition, what difference does it make? They're on a need-to-know basis, and they don't need to know.
Here's where conservatives must pay close attention. Americans like it this way. We don't want the gory details. We want experts we can trust to keep our anxious, harried minds away from the endless stress case of global management. We didn't really want to know about the CIA's black sites. We don't really want to know what Hillary Clinton is doing when she's not out there fighting everyday for working families.
Americans have never had a lot of patience for protracted conflict in an uncertain world. Love it or hate it, the New Isolationism that Team Clinton is prepared to promote carries a broad, inherent appeal. Americans have always fretted about the security of their station in life. Especially these days, they increasingly look to government for reassurance that the burden of fretting about foreign policy can be gently lifted away. It would be remarkable if the left finally mainstreamed a greater concern for domestic "safe spaces" than for the safety of America — or democracy, or freedom, or the world. But it would not be shocking.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
James Poulos is a contributing editor at National Affairs and the author of The Art of Being Free, out January 17 from St. Martin's Press. He has written on freedom and the politics of the future for publications ranging from The Federalist to Foreign Policy and from Good to Vice. He fronts the band Night Years in Los Angeles, where he lives with his son.
-
'A speaker courageous enough to stand up to the extremists in his own party'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
How could the Supreme Court's Fischer v. US case impact the other Jan 6. trials including Trump's?
Today's Big Question A former Pennsylvania cop might hold the key to a major upheaval in how the courts treat the Capitol riot — and its alleged instigator
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 18, 2024
Cartoons Thursday's cartoons - impeachment Peanuts, record-breaking temperatures, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published