You can't ban corruption. Stop trying.
It's as American as apple pie
You probably think corruption is everywhere, and that it is terrible. Maybe you're right. But there's almost nothing you can do about it.
This is our American reality. Behold our polarized politics and our money-worshipping culture! Feast your eyes on American politicians of all stripes grubbing for the edge only dollars can earn! There's Marco Rubio on his biweekly foreign policy call with Macau casino magnate Sheldon Adelson! And there's Hillary Clinton using her family foundation as a global cash cow to rival even the biggest of windfalls in cattle futures!
Power players on all sides engage in various forms of corruption. But we have a tendency to defend the corrupt among us and skewer those we disagree with. While our political opponents howl, we circle the wagons around the money magnets in our preferred political tribe. Because we sense, deep down, that currying favor with donors and benefactors really is a high-stakes investment in a kind of futures market.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Even an ethicist would sagely observe that to "get the money out of politics," we'd have to get the power out of politics. But if we do that, we risk losing the future. Corruption is as competitive a business as any. Better we benefit, and do something nice with the money, than our adversaries (at home or abroad) entice the plutocrats to line their pockets — and not ours.
At its worst, this point of view devolves into a jackal-like determination merely to get our share of the action. But in a sense, even that level of cynicism can be morally outdone. Why not replace the bad old vision of competition with the ever-progressive idea of collaboration? If international money sloshes freely across all coffers, can't international peace and security travel as freely? Republicans are more comfortable when mega-corporations lead the way; Democrats, mega-foundations. Can't we all just get along?
You can see how following this logic leads us very far afield from the small ball of presidential donor season. Democrats fume that Adelson might drop a fresh $150 million on the 2016 campaign — failing to note just how little money that is by any relevant standard. By comparison, in 2013, it cost over $400 million to field Ferrari's Formula One race team. Presidential politics is a small sandbox for the moneyed super-elite. Just ask Newt Gingrich, whose Adelson infusion wound up affecting the 2012 race about as much as a Facebook like.
As the Clinton cash saga reveals, the out-of-office money game is the real devil's playground. Instead of just one reason to rake in the green, there's a theoretically unending supply. Here a speech, there an appearance, there an exercise of "influence" or a connection between "friends." Do it right, and you can actually spend years arbitraging your own return to political power.
It's enough to make everyday Americans cry out for some kind of policy reform. Surely there's some way to turn the formidable power of the federal government against sleazy and wanton deeds?
Not really, unfortunately. Although laws against flagrant abuse have a clear point, the problem with corruption is that it can't be banned in a free society. It's even harder to crack down on corruption than it is to outlaw alcohol or pornography. Elites hang out with each other. That's what they do. It's what makes them elite.
As much as it galls the rest of us, there's only one surefire way to prevent them from sinking into decadent, dangerous venality. Vote in the incorruptible. And vote out the scoundrels. No matter how good they are at politics. No matter whose team they're on.
No wonder we see corruption everywhere. We despise the idea of bejeweled despots — unless they can flatter our favorite prejudices.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
James Poulos is a contributing editor at National Affairs and the author of The Art of Being Free, out January 17 from St. Martin's Press. He has written on freedom and the politics of the future for publications ranging from The Federalist to Foreign Policy and from Good to Vice. He fronts the band Night Years in Los Angeles, where he lives with his son.
-
Do youth curfews work?
Today's big question Banning unaccompanied children from towns and cities is popular with some voters but is contentious politically
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Sleaze baack!'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 20 - 26 April
Puzzles and Quizzes Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published