Hillary Clinton's impossible challenge: Fact-checking Donald Trump at the debate
Trump will lie like crazy at Monday's debate. How can Clinton possibly respond?
When Donald Trump came out last Friday and finally gave up his long effort to convince people of the lie that Barack Obama was born somewhere other than the United States — and in the process told two more brazen lies, that Hillary Clinton and her 2008 campaign started the birther controversy, and "I finished it" — some news organizations had plainly had enough.
They described the event using blunt terms of a kind they ordinarily shy away from, saying not merely that Trump "strayed from the truth" or "made a claim at odds with the facts" but simply that he "lied." As New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet later told Quartz, "we have decided to be more direct in calling things out when a candidate actually lies." Many of his colleagues are feeling the same way.
This didn't happen just because the particular lies Trump told were so blatant and obvious. It came after over a year in which Trump proved himself to be nothing less than the most dishonest candidate in living memory, by an incalculable margin.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Which raises an immediate question for his opponent Hillary Clinton. On Monday, the two candidates will meet for their first debate, one that could be among the most watched in history. How is she going to react when Trump lies?
Because he will, of that there's no doubt. It's possible that at some point in the debate, Clinton will say something untrue. But it is an absolute certainty that Donald Trump will not only lie, but will lie multiple times. He is constitutionally incapable of doing otherwise. I'm fairly certain that there has not been a single speech or event in this campaign where he didn't say things that were obviously, demonstrably untrue. One journalist, Daniel Dale, has made documenting Trump's lies something of a hobby; to take an example, he counted 12 different lies Trump told just on Monday.
This is what he does. Trump lies about big things and small things, about himself and other people, about the past and the future. And while Trump's unending stream of falsehood has led some news organizations to attempt fact-checking him on the fly, it's unlikely that the debate moderators will do so. The moderator of the final debate, Fox News' Chris Wallace, has already said, "I do not believe that it's my job to be a truth squad. It's up to the other person to catch them on that." The other moderators will probably take the same approach. Which means we could have a lot of exchanges that sound like this:
Now let's imagine you're a member of the audience, and you didn't actually know what the truth was. What would you conclude? Trump says one thing, Clinton says something else. Who knows?
That's precisely how Trump gets away with so much dishonesty: Most people don't read fact-checks, and even if they hear a reporter say Trump isn't telling the truth, they'll discount it if they like him. He also gets backup from his allies. For instance, after his birther event, Republicans fanned out to repeat the lie about Clinton being the first one to question Obama's birthplace; every Sunday show that weekend featured some Republican saying confidently that the whole thing really was started by her. No matter how many times the shows' hosts contradicted them, they plowed right ahead, insisting it was true.
And while they may not have been able to convince everyone, they've probably convinced most Republicans to go along with this new story. That's how information and positions get spread: The elite of the party, like politicians and media figures, repeats an idea over and over, and as their partisans in the rank and file hear it coming from the figures they trust, they adopt it as their own. For those in the middle, it's just one more dispute between the parties, and the truth must lie somewhere in the middle.
Right now Hillary Clinton is busily preparing for the debate, practicing, going over briefing books, and devising strategies with her advisers. But has she come up with an answer to this conundrum? When faced with an opponent who will happily lie and won't care if he gets corrected, what do you do?
I wish I had the answer to that question, but I don't. Of course, I also don't have an army of pollsters and staff at my disposal whom I can order to figure it out. But one thing Clinton should understand is that she can't count on the press coming to her defense afterward.
In ordinary elections, post-debate coverage plays a key role in determining how we understand what happened. Reporters home in on a few moments that were supposed to be decisive (particularly the key "gaffes") and repeat them over and over, leaving those moments to be all anyone remembers of the debate. But it might not be the same this year, even if there are plentiful fact-checks and explanations.
That's because Trump is unlike any other candidate we've seen. He isn't chastened when he's caught lying, and he isn't shy about creating an alternate reality in which his supporters will live. As soon as the debate ends, he will proudly tell reporters that all the polls are saying he won (even if no polls have been taken yet), and everybody is telling him how great he did. And the people supporting him will lap up every word, no matter what a bunch of lowdown anti-Trump journalists tell them. After all, it's the journalists who are the liars, right? Donald Trump is the only one you can really trust.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Immunotherapy and hay fever
The Explainer Research shows that the treatment could provide significant relief from symptoms for many hay fever sufferers
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
The week's best photos
In Pictures A flooded island, a ballistic missile, and more
By Anahi Valenzuela, The Week US Published
-
Who actually needs life insurance?
The Explainer If you have kids or are worried about passing on debt, the added security may be worth it
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published