The Republican tax bill is already on the ropes
And the first round hasn't even started yet
The GOP's tax reform effort is already on the ropes — and the first round hasn't even started yet.
House Republicans will finally unveil the actual bill behind their tax reform plans on Thursday. They say they want to pass it through the House by Thanksgiving, then through the Senate and onto President Trump's desk before year's end.
There are myriad reasons why this seems unlikely. But let's begin with the most recent and prominent one. It's also something that's bedeviled the entire Republican legislative agenda since Trump took office: Keeping the party's small-but-crucial moderate wing happy.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
On Monday, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) made two demands: 1. The tax package shouldn't lower the individual tax rate of 39.6 percent for people making over $1 million; and 2. The estate tax shouldn't be eliminated, as the outline released by the White House and GOP leadership called for.
Republicans hold a commanding majority in the House, but only a two-vote edge in the Senate. So if they lose Collins, they can only afford one other defection.
That said, Republicans were fiddling with the idea of leaving the 39.6 percent rate in place for millionaires already. And because the estate tax levies a 40 percent rate only on the portion of inheritances that exceeds $5.49 million ($10.98 million for couples), there's a lot that Republicans could do — raise the threshold, lower the rate — without killing it off entirely.
So how hard will it be for the GOP to accept Collins' demands? It depends on just how many Republican ideological stalwarts will insist on total elimination of the estate tax and nothing less.
The next issue for the Republicans is less dramatic. But it's been simmering for a while, and could be more consequential.
The basic logic behind the tax reform plan is to cut rates — which would lose revenue — while clearing out loopholes — which would increase revenue. The budget blueprint the Republicans recently passed allows for $1.5 trillion in additional deficits over the next 10 years, so the goal isn't revenue neutrality. But since the the party is aiming for something like $5 trillion in total tax cuts, they'll still need to clear out $3.5 trillion in deductions, breaks, and other carve-outs in the code. (Or they'll have to cut spending.)
The problem is that every loophole in the tax code is there because someone lobbied to put it there. Which means every loophole the GOP kills is going to piss someone off, which could lose them votes.
The way Congress dealt with this challenge in the past was by making tax reform a bipartisan affair. Think of the 1986 tax overhaul, which used the same cut-the-rates, clear-out-the-loopholes logic. Getting both parties involved maximizes the potential combinations of votes you can use to get to a majority.
But this time, the Republicans have decided they don't want the Democrats involved at all. That's why they plan to pass the tax bill via reconciliation — a procedural tool that avoids the 60-vote threshold of the filibuster in the Senate. So the Republicans have a lot less room to maneuver. And chunks of their coalition are already getting pissed off about parts of the plan.
For instance, one big item was going to be eliminating the federal tax deduction for state and local taxes, which would've brought in around $1.3 trillion over 10 years all by itself. But Republican representatives from high-tax states didn't like that. So now it looks like the bill will still allow deductions for state and local property taxes specifically — which knocks the revenue gain down to about $870 billion. Republicans were also thinking of changing the tax treatment for 401(k)s in order to bring in new revenue, until President Trump scuttled the idea. So it's not at all obvious how Republicans are going to make both the politics and the budget math work in tandem.
In fact, the original plan was for the House to release its version of the bill today. But late last night, they delayed the rollout until Thursday. As Axios reported, "The likely delay of the scheduled release ... reveals the difficulties the team has had in resolving how to raise enough money to pay for the massive corporate tax cuts."
Like I said, the Republican tax plan is on the ropes, not knocked out already. But there are still plenty of rounds to go.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeff Spross was the economics and business correspondent at TheWeek.com. He was previously a reporter at ThinkProgress.
-
Ottawa climate talks: can global plastic problem be solved?
In the spotlight Nations aim to draft world's first treaty on plastic pollution, but resistance from oil- and gas-producing countries could limit scope
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Netherlands split on WFH for sex workers
Speed Read Councils concerned over 'nuisance' of at-home sex work, but others say changes will curb underground sex trade
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
'He adored Trump, and then rejected him'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published