There's nothing futile about the gun debate
A belief in the futility of action inevitably becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. So Democrats: Just try.
When politicians campaign for office, they usually portray themselves as potent and powerful, even when they aren't. Elect me, they say, and everything will be transformed, no matter how absurd it is to think that some backbench freshman member of Congress is going to "change the way they do business in Washington" or "get our economy back on track."
There is one area, however, where politicians (especially those from one party) work hard to tamp down expectations and say that there's really nothing they can do about one of the country's most pressing problems: guns.
The party, of course, is the Republicans. And after yet another massacre inside a school committed with a military-style rifle, they want to make sure everyone understands that passing laws — the thing they are elected to do — is pointless, so there's really no point in trying.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The blood hasn't even been cleaned off the floor before you can find prominent Republicans saying that gun violence is like the weather. You might want to prepare for it — give your kids active shooter drills, like you'd put an umbrella in your bag if you think it might rain — but it certainly can't be stopped. As Marco Rubio said on Thursday, the day after 17 of his constituents were slaughtered in Parkland, "I'm trying to be clear and honest here, if someone's decided to commit this crime, they'll find a way to get the gun to do it." His colleague Ted Cruz told Fox & Friends, "We have seen that evil can occur whether at Parkland or at a church in Central Texas, or in schools across the country. There are murderers. Evil is, sadly, always present." What are you gonna do?
Imagine what the response would be if after a terrorist attack, a senator said, "There's no point in beefing up security at airports. If someone has decided to commit an act of terrorism, they'll find a way to do it. Evil is, sadly, always present."
That's not how we react to terrorism. We don't treat it as inevitable, we try to figure out how to stop it. And in fact, our representatives made a choice after 9/11 to take all kinds of measures that infringed on civil liberties and were of questionable practical value in order to forestall future terrorist attacks.
It takes about a month for as many Americans to die from gunfire as perished in the 9/11 attacks, yet we make a choice to do nothing.
In addition to their protestations of the futility of any action to address gun violence, Republicans have a second response, offered with almost perfect bad faith: The real problem isn't guns at all, they say, but mental illness. But what do they propose to do about our mental health system? Well ... nothing. That's not to mention the fact that mental illness doesn't actually have much of anything to do with gun violence.
But even if it did, here's something you might not have realized: In other countries, the ones where gun violence is a fraction of what it is in the United States? They have mental illness too! They also have domestic abusers (there's a strong connection between mass shooting and domestic violence), and angry young men. What they don't have is gun laws as permissive as ours.
Those laws, the ones that make it easy for someone like Nikolas Cruz to get an AR-15 so easily when he isn't even old enough to buy beer, were also a choice that we made. There was nothing futile about it. They express the values of the people who advocated for them, and they have profound and powerful effects on the society we've constructed.
For their part, Democrats have their own narrative of futility, but it's one that unfortunately too many of them actually believe. It says that there's no point in trying to change gun laws, because the NRA has a stranglehold on Congress and they'll only risk their jobs if they try.
While it's true that the GOP has wedded itself to the extremist ideology of gun rights advocates, there's nothing futile about opposing the NRA. People do it all the time. Barack Obama did it, and he got elected twice. Last year in Virginia — the state where the NRA is headquartered — the group's favored candidates got wiped out, despite the fact that they poured millions into the election. They fought against the Democratic candidates for governor, lieutenant governor, and attorney general, all of whom won. "Each one of us is very proud of our F" rating from the NRA, said the now-lieutenant governor, Justin Fairfax. There were 13 competitive state house races where the NRA endorsed a Republican and gun safety groups endorsed the Democrat — and Democrats won 12. The 13th was the race that was tied and had to be decided by drawing lots.
You might protest that this was an election where Democrats did well up and down the ballot, and you'd be right. But that's just the point: The NRA can't destroy its enemies when Democratic voters are motivated and energized.
Which brings us to the most important lesson Democrats need to learn: A belief in the futility of action inevitably becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you accept that there's no point in trying to pass measures to reduce gun violence, nothing happens and the pro-gun side only gets stronger. If you're too afraid to argue for those policy changes, the public never hears the arguments and won't be motivated to support you. If you resign yourself to the pro-gun voters being more engaged on the issue and so you never try to get those who agree with you engaged, the engagement gap will only widen.
Even if gun violence can never be reduced to zero, we can pass gun safety laws that would actually reduce the unending carnage so many people would have us accept as an inevitable feature of American life. We just have to be willing to try.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Assad's fall upends the Captagon drug empire
Multi-billion-dollar drug network sustained former Syrian regime
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
The key financial dates to prepare for in 2025
The Explainer Discover the main money milestones that may affect you in the new year
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: December 19, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published