Is it too late for peace to prevail in American politics?
Can the dangerous spiral toward political violence be stopped?
It seems like the United States is spiraling toward an awful moment. A moment we won't be able to walk back, when the potential for serious political violence finally catalyzes — a day when pipe bombs announce themselves not as mail, but as actual, deadly explosions targeting prominent Americans in politics and the media.
But it's not too late.
Certainly, those of us who follow politics closely can become consumed by our disagreements and how we express them. Today's issue is the most important thing in the world, until tomorrow's issue comes along and becomes the most important thing in the world. Sometimes it is the most important thing in the world. Usually, though, the volume of our arguments goes straight to 10 simply because that's what we've become used to, the amplification provided by a never-ending news cycle, social media, and the dopamine hit that comes from our "someone is wrong on the internet!" crusades for justice.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Given this hostile and emotionally charged environment, it's not a huge surprise when leaders, elected and otherwise, start receiving pipe bombs in the mail, as was the case this week when suspicious packages containing explosives were sent to former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and other prominent Democrats.
As of this writing, we don't know who sent the bombs, nor why they did so. Maybe it's some crazed criminal who wants attention, like John Hinckley Jr. But for the moment, this sure looks like a political act: The threat those pipe bombs represents comes at what feels like a cultural tipping point, when passions are high and the potential for political violence is as conspicuous as the bad old days of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Blood has already been spilled in this political environment: Heather Heyer was killed last year while protesting a white supremacist rally, and GOP Rep. Steve Scalise (La.) was grievously injured when a gunman opened fire on the Republican congressional baseball team.
If the awful, irreversible moment finally arrives — and as my colleague Ryan Cooper notes, the threat appears to be coming mostly from the right — we won't be able to say we didn't see it coming.
How can we stop this spiral?
First, we can cast out the charlatans. If you don't want violence in American politics, you simply cannot give your support to a president who so openly celebrates assaults on a reporter, shrugs at the murder of another, and equivocates about responsibility when a white supremacist kills an anti-racism activist. Yes, Trump called the pipe-bomb attacks "despicable," but he has a long history of winking at violence. Such leaders don't deserve your vote. Neither does a political party that makes excuses for them.
Second, we can stop making excuses when our own side crosses boundaries. Hate the Proud Boys? You should probably criticize Antifa. Think the Democrats are inspiring mobs? You might want to rethink those old Tea Party protests. Hold yourself, and your side, to the same standards you hold your opponents.
Third, we can all stop wallowing in victimization. Do a little reading across the political spectrum, and it becomes clear that one common belief unites rank-and-file partisans on both the left and right: Our side is weak. The other side is strong. They'll do anything to win, including disregard the norms and rules that we, weakly, play by. So the only way for us to compete is by disregarding the rules, too. This universal presumption of bad faith creates a vicious circle. Trump, in particular, benefits from this process — not because his supporters always think he's a good guy, but because many think his nastiness protects them.
Maybe we'll get lucky. Perhaps this mad bomber is merely a mad bomber, and not some political zealot who tried to eliminate all of the right's bogeymen in the span of just a few days. But if it does end up being the case that these attacks boiled up from our increasingly polarized political culture, it's up to each of us to reconsider how we contribute to and participate in that culture, no matter how much we suspect the "other side" is at fault. We must do better than hope against violence or criticize its practitioners — we must actively work for peace, remembering always that "true peace … is the presence of justice."
Political violence, once unleashed, is nearly impossible to contain. It creates more suffering than solutions. And once the cycle starts, we don't know where it ends. We're awfully close to crossing that cultural tipping point, but we can still make better choices. It's not too late.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Why ghost guns are so easy to make — and so dangerous
The Explainer Untraceable, DIY firearms are a growing public health and safety hazard
By David Faris Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published