Who bought the attorney general?
Matthew Whitaker's anonymous benefactor shows why "dark money" is so dangerous
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36917/36917f04aa7ab058b829270fef36cff3060bbe00" alt="Matt Whitaker."
When a corporation or wealthy individual donates vast sums to promote a political cause or candidate, the Supreme Court has held, it is not a form of corruption. It is free speech — and therefore cannot be limited. Citizens United and related rulings would, perhaps, not have had such a pernicious influence on our country's politics had it not been for the "dark money" loophole in the tax code. "Social welfare" or 501(c)(4) groups, which supposedly devote most of their efforts to charitable good works, are legally allowed to conceal their donors. Hundreds of millions of dollars now flow through groups on both the left and right with such anodyne names as "Freedom Partners" and "Patriot Majority." The acting attorney general, Matthew Whitaker, was paid $1.2 million by one such "charity" to serve as a TV attack-dog partisan. Who paid Whitaker so generously, and how might those payments now influence his supervision of Special Counsel Robert Mueller? Sorry: That's none of your business.
Anonymous speech, we have learned in recent years, can be a corrosive force. On Facebook and Twitter and in internet chat rooms, nameless or disguised trolls have amplified Russian disinformation and convinced millions of baseless conspiracy theories. They've spread anti-Semitism, racism, and misogyny, and tried to intimidate opponents and journalists with death threats. This is cowardly speech, free of all consequence. Defenders of anonymity argue that corporations and rich people might be subjected to protests, boycotts, and other repercussions if their attempts to buy influence became public. So? In the real world, we all face consequences for exercising our right to speak freely. If you publicly embarrass your employer, you can be fired; if you libel innocent people, you can be sued; if you traffic in hatred, you can be shunned. If we are to have an attorney general beholden to a benefactor, we should at least know who bought and paid for him.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
William Falk is editor-in-chief of The Week, and has held that role since the magazine's first issue in 2001. He has previously been a reporter, columnist, and editor at the Gannett Westchester Newspapers and at Newsday, where he was part of two reporting teams that won Pulitzer Prizes.
-
5 exclusive cartoons about Trump and Putin negotiating peace
Cartoons Artists take on alternative timelines, missing participants, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The AI arms race
Talking Point The fixation on AI-powered economic growth risks drowning out concerns around the technology which have yet to be resolved
By The Week UK Published
-
Why Jannik Sinner's ban has divided the tennis world
In the Spotlight The timing of the suspension handed down to the world's best male tennis player has been met with scepticism
By The Week UK Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published