The State of the Union was Trump's best speech in two years
His remarks were careful, restrained, and even dignified
President Trump gave his second State of the Union address Tuesday night, and only the most blinkered partisan could deny that the speech was a success. It was, in fact, the best speech this president has given in two years. Not since his inaugural address in January 2017 has he spoken so well on such an important stage to the concerns of ordinary Americans — as opposed to the conservative movement and his hardcore fan base.
In remarks that ran to about an hour and a half there were, by my count, some 78 standing ovations from members of the president's party and other guests. Many of these joined by Democrats as well. This was a tedious exercise, not least because getting up to clap for everything and everyone from the first lady to Buzz Aldrin to energy statistics made the whole thing last about twice as long as it might have otherwise. But the effect was unmistakable. Trump was working the crowd in front of him physically just as effectively as he was his intended television audience — i.e., the blue and purple-state moderates he needs in order to win again in 2020.
This is not to suggest that Trump's speech was without serious problems.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The president can say whatever he likes about the supposed "economic miracle" of our record-low unemployment, the modest increases in wages some workers are enjoying, and the would-be boom in manufacturing jobs. The truth is that, as I write this, General Motors and Ford are both planning on laying off thousands of employees, not because either company is insolvent —indeed both are healthily profitable — but because consultants have convinced them that doing so will increase their stock prices. This is not only immoral — it is unpatriotic. It was inexcusable for a president who decried the impact of NAFTA, mentioning states like Michigan and Ohio by name, not to address the greed and stupidity of those who have taken over our auto industry.
Then there was Trump's line about how, if he had not been elected in 2016, the United States would now be engaged in a major war with North Korea. It is hard to imagine this being the case, though it is probably the case that the limited progress in our relations with the Hermit Kingdom made by his administration would not have been achieved by his opponent — or by any conventional diplomacy. What is almost certainly true, however, is that if Hillary Clinton had won instead, the United States would not be leaving Syria or Afghanistan.
On the whole, though, Trump's remarks were careful, restrained, and, within the limits imposed by the format, even dignified. Around 90 percent of what he said was utterly uncontroversial. I defy anyone to point to even a single thing that could be considered offensive, except perhaps to murderers or terrorists or drug dealers or people who believe the moon landing was a hoax.
Trump said that men and women deserve to be able to take time away from work to be with their children after they are born, that prescription medications should be made cheaper, that the criminal justice system has failed African Americans. He praised the courage of police officers, World War II veterans, Holocaust survivors, and astronauts. He said that free trade has destroyed the American dream in the post-industrial Midwest and that "great nations do not fight endless wars." He said that all Americans, including infants in utero, are made in the image of God.
If Democrats want to run against Trump on the opposite of all these things, they should go ahead and try. They will lose. This is not a radical or far-right agenda. It is not in many parts even a Republican one, at least by the standards of the GOP in opposition under Barack Obama.
Eternal Trumpism has always been a carnival. But if even Democrats are jumping up and down, dancing, and giving each other high fives, the American people are not ready to get off the merry-go-round just yet.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Matthew Walther is a national correspondent at The Week. His work has also appeared in First Things, The Spectator of London, The Catholic Herald, National Review, and other publications. He is currently writing a biography of the Rev. Montague Summers. He is also a Robert Novak Journalism Fellow.
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published