Why Fauci should quit
Would resigning from his government post allow him to do more for public health?
It is time for Dr. Anthony Fauci to quit government. Indeed, resigning might be the best thing he can do for the country's public health — not to mention his own dignity.
Back in the early days of the pandemic, when President Trump was still veering wildly between wanting to be seen as combatting COVID-19 and urging the reopening of the U.S. economy, Fauci's presence on the coronavirus task force — and, often, at the podium in the White House press room — offered reassurance to Americans that Trump was taking expert advice. There was a tradeoff: Fauci was used as a fig leaf for Trump's incompetence, but he got to use the presidential bullhorn to warn the country against taking the virus lightly.
That is no longer the case. The president has evidently given up on battling the pandemic, choosing instead to declare victory even as cases and deaths surge across the country. Meanwhile, recent days have brought ample evidence that Trump has sidelined, silenced, and undermined Fauci, who continues — mostly behind the scenes — to argue for a cautious approach to reopening the country. His fact-based pessimism about the country's progress against the coronavirus has provided too stark a contrast with Trump's magical thinking.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
So Trump and his allies have chosen to discredit Fauci instead of listen to him, sending a list of his errors to journalists and publicly criticizing him.
"Dr. Fauci is a nice man, but he's made a lot of mistakes," Trump told Sean Hannity last week, while telling another interviewer that he disagreed with Fauci's attitude. "I think we are in a good place," the president said.
"Dr. Fauci has a good bedside manner with the public but he has been wrong about everything I have ever interacted with him on," Peter Navarro, Trump's trade advisor, told The Washington Post. (Judge accordingly: Navarro used his Sunday morning TV appearance to suggest that China purposely unleashed the COVID-19 virus on the world, even though scientists believe the virus developed on its own.)
Fauci, meanwhile, told the Financial Times last week that he had not briefed Trump for two months. The White House has also reportedly prevented him from making appearances on TV.
"I have a reputation, as you probably have figured out, of speaking the truth at all times and not sugar-coating things. And that may be one of the reasons why I haven't been on television very much lately," Fauci told the FT.
It is true that Fauci has been wrong about some things during the pandemic — most notably, he discouraged Americans from wearing masks during the first weeks of the national lockdown. He also admitted the error and reversed course in the face of new and additional facts. That's what scientists do.
More importantly, Fauci has been perhaps the country's most credible voice on how to contain the virus — warning against the temptation to reopen the country too quickly, quashing improbable presidential notions of miracle cures, and pleading for continued social distancing. For this, he has been treated with derision by public officials across the country as they work, impossibly, for a return to normalcy that probably can't happen until a vaccine emerges or effective treatments for COVID-19 are made available.
"Clearly we are not in total control right now," Fauci told the Senate in late June. The weeks since then have confirmed that analysis, and revealed the president's happy talk to be hollow and dangerous.
The doctor is more than a public relations mouthpiece — as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, he plays a key role in overseeing the development of a vaccine and treatments for the coronavirus — but his best and perhaps most effective role during this crisis has been as a sober voice urging Americans to be on guard. It may not be a coincidence that, as Fauci has receded from public view, Americans' caution has ebbed and COVID cases have surged.
And so, Fauci should quit.
Quitting would allow Fauci to speak to the public more freely about the ongoing health crisis than he can now. Even without an official portfolio, he would almost certainly still be welcome on any news network, podcast, YouTube channel, or newspaper op-ed page to sound the alarm and make the case for what he believes is the correct approach to containing the pandemic. He wouldn't even have to criticize Trump directly, since he clearly seems averse to doing so. But he would have the freedom to offer his best advice to the American public, who right now seem more willing than the president to take Fauci seriously.
Many state and local health officials across the country have faced death threats and vicious personal attacks for the crime of trying to keep their citizens alive by disseminating scientific information. That is terrible. Unlike those officials, Fauci is positioned to affect the public discourse even after he leaves government. For the sake of America's health, he should do so.
Want more essential commentary and analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for The Week's "Today's best articles" newsletter here.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a freelance writer who has spent nine years as a syndicated columnist, co-writing the RedBlueAmerica column as the liberal half of a point-counterpoint duo. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic, The Kansas City Star and Heatmap News. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
'Horror stories of women having to carry nonviable fetuses'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Haiti interim council, prime minister sworn in
Speed Read Prime Minister Ariel Henry resigns amid surging gang violence
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 26, 2024
Cartoons Friday's cartoons - teleprompter troubles, presidential immunity, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
'Christie performed a needed service for American democracy'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published