The rise and rise of Center Parcs: ‘the paradise machine’
The holiday resort chain is up for sale, with a price tag somewhere north of £4bn. What is the secret of its success?

It all began “with an idea”, according to the Center Parcs website: “the idea of bringing people and nature together”.
In 1968, Piet Derksen, a Dutch entrepreneur who owned a successful sporting goods chain, Sporthuis Centrum, set up De Lommerbergen, a holiday retreat in the woods near Reuver, close to the German border: initially just a series of tents in a field for his staff and customers.
But Derksen, who was also a devout conservative Catholic, soon grasped its potential, and conceived a vision of what he called “the villa in the forest”: an idyllic escape from city life. He commissioned the architect Jaap Bakema to make his vision a reality. Bakema designed a plan for a holiday village, with 30 simple, modernist bungalows nestled unobtrusively in the woodland, clustered around a “Center” that combined a swimming pool and other sports facilities. It provided a blueprint that is still replicated in Center Parcs today.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
How did the company grow?
The concept was an instant hit, and in the 1970s five more villages were constructed. However, the winning formula was not really completed until 1980, when the “Aqua Mundo” was built at the De Eemhof village near Amsterdam: a glass dome containing a swimming pool complete with slides, wave machines and Jacuzzis, surrounded by lush tropical foliage. This was a big moment for the brand, writes the architect Tim O’Callaghan in his dissertation on what he calls “the paradise machine”, “cementing its ability to compete as a year-round destination, while also providing its first real architectural icon”. It was renamed Center Parcs in 1986. By 1987, when the first resort opened in the UK, in Sherwood Forest, there were Parcs in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Today there are 27 in mainland Europe, and six in the UK and Ireland. (The two companies have been separately owned since 2001; Derksen sold his shares in 1989.)
What’s the attraction?
The resorts present themselves as a safe, stress-free, traffic-free haven, offering a wide array of leisure activities, from swimming and cycling to falconry and fencing. Cars must be left at the entrance, but all resorts are conveniently close to a motorway or commuter hub. Guests still stay in “villas” or “treehouses” nestled in woodland. The British villages are all about 400 acres in size. They provide proximity to a manicured version of nature, but also access to artificial lakes, sports pitches, spas and restaurants; there are branches of Starbucks and Café Rouge on site. At the heart of all six UK and Irish sites sits a vast glazed “Subtropical Swimming Paradise”, heated to 29.5°C year-round – a geodesic dome in Sherwood Forest, a pyramid in Elveden Forest, a “giant clam” in Woburn Forest – providing weather-proof entertainment. Center Parcs has been described as a middle-class utopia, a Shangri-La for parents with young children, a “Boden Butlin’s”.
What about the downsides?
Center Parcs certainly has its detractors. “We all have our own idea of what hell looks like,” Kathryn Knight told the Daily Mail, “and mine is the domed Subtropical Swimming Paradise at Center Parcs in Woburn Forest, on a Saturday morning.” The Parcs have been described by critics as like living in a giant Ikea or an open prison (they all have perimeter fences to keep children in and unwanted visitors out). The identikit lodges, some complain, are soulless and give the place a “Truman Show”-like feel; the food, some say, is expensive and mediocre. Mainly, though, it’s the prices that people object to: in school holidays, these will often exceed an all-inclusive holiday abroad. A four-night break for a family of four in August costs between £1,449 and £4,199 (for an “exclusive lodge”). On top of that, guests have to shell out for food (the lodges are self-catering) and though swimming is free, activities cost extra: from hiring bicycles to teddy bear making (£25.50 for ten minutes), table tennis (up to £8.75 for 30 mins) and “quad bike safari” (up to £47.50 an hour).
How popular are they?
Despite the high prices, and the odd PR disaster (the business tried to banish guests for 24 hours “as a mark of respect” over The Queen’s funeral last year, though it later U-turned on the decision), Center Parcs are still hugely popular. The British and Irish resorts attract more than two million visitors each year, and they are effectively full, all the time: the annual occupancy rate is over 97%. More than half of visitors return within five years. Since Covid, Center Parcs have benefitted from the boom in “staycations”, and during the cost-of-living crisis, they seem relatively affordable: they offer budget options, and also appeal to wealthier customers trading down from foreign trips.
How big is the business?
The UK and Irish business is being put up for sale by its owners, the global real estate group Brookfield Property Partners. Although no official statement has been issued, the price tag is reported to be between £4bn and £5bn – about double the £2.4bn Brookfield bought it for in 2015. If that seems exorbitant, the company is a giant cash machine: it booked revenue of £426.6m between April and December 2022, up 18% on its pre-pandemic figures. It made pre-tax profits of £66.2m for the year to April 2022.
What does the future hold?
Center Parcs is hoping to build another village in the UK (though plans for another site in West Sussex, near Gatwick, were rejected on environmental grounds). And whoever owns it, Europe’s answer to Disneyland, offering a safe, sanitised version of nature, looks likely to go from strength to strength. The secret of the brand’s success is that people will pay through the nose for child-centred holidays. As customers say: “If the kids are happy, we’re happy.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why does the U.S. need China's rare earth metals?
Today's Big Question Beijing has a 'near monopoly' on tech's raw materials
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
When did divorce begin?
The Explaine Couples have always split up, but the institution has undergone major changes over the years
By David Faris
-
What are your retirement savings account options?
The explainer The two main types of accounts are 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts (IRAs)
By Becca Stanek, The Week US
-
Work life: Caution settles on the job market
Feature The era of job-hopping for bigger raises is coming to an end as workers face shrinking salaries and fewer opportunities to move up
By The Week US
-
Saving the post office
Feature The U.S. Postal Service is facing mounting losses and growing calls for privatization. Can it survive?
By The Week US
-
Safe harbor: Gold rises as stocks sink
feature It's a golden age for goldbugs
By The Week US
-
What is the Mar-a-Lago accord?
Talking Point A Maga economic blueprint proposes upending the global financial system. Could it fly?
By The Week UK
-
Elon Musk: has he made Tesla toxic?
Talking Point Musk's political antics have given him the 'reverse Midas touch' when it comes to his EV empire
By The Week UK
-
Texas vs. Delaware: See you in court
Feature Delaware risks losing its corporate dominance as companies like Tesla and Meta consider reincorporating in Texas
By The Week US
-
Trade wars, explained
The Explainer Free trade is almost always good for any economy – so why is it so unpopular?
By The Week UK
-
Diversity training: a victim of the 'war on woke'
Talking Point More and more US companies have phased out corporate DEI initiatives, and the incoming Trump administration is likely to fuel the cultural shift
By The Week UK