Center Parcs announced last week that it would close its UK “villages” for the Queen’s funeral, “as a mark of our respect and to allow as many of our colleagues as possible to be part of this historic moment”.
Amazingly, no one anticipated the “huge backlash from angry holidaymakers” who faced being turfed out mid-stay, said Andrew Ellson in The Times. The inevitable U-turn rendered the situation farcical. At one point Center Parcs suggested guests could only stay on site if they remained “in their lodges”. This too was soon reversed.
“For all the horror and tragedy of death”, it can produce “unexpected moments of light relief”, said Marina Hyde in The Guardian. To that extent, we owe Center Parcs a debt. It was just “impossible” not to picture oneself in a “lodge-effect detention hut, cowering by the forest-mural feature wall as village guards toured the site”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
On Twitter, the wags excelled themselves. “Good luck removing guests from the parks,” wrote one. “You’ve trained them in archery, shooting, swimming, canoeing and swinging through the trees like apes. You’ve basically got five village-loads of ninjas to clear out.”
This fiasco was merely the most extreme example of a brand making a mess of its royal tribute, said Guy Kelly in The Daily Telegraph – or seeking, in the crassest of ways, to profit from them.
Center Parcs, which is owned by Brookfield Property Partners, will probably emerge unscathed, said Emma Jacobs in the FT: it confused customers, but didn’t commit the cardinal sin of insulting them. But, overall, the mass outbreak of corporate “virtue-signalling” ran counter to the Queen’s enduring example of “dignified restraint”. As one PR expert put it: “If you have a royal warrant, then it’s fine to put something out there. But otherwise, just shut up.”
-
Why ‘anti-Islam’ bikers are guarding Gaza aid sitesIn The Spotlight Members of Infidels MC, who regard themselves as modern Crusaders, among private security guards at Gaza Humanitarian Foundation sites
-
China: Xi seeks to fill America’s voidFeature Trump’s tariffs are pushing nations eastward as Xi Jinping focuses on strengthening ties with global leaders
-
Rebrands: Bringing back the War DepartmentFeature Trump revives the Department of Defense’s former name
-
What is the job market's future after Trump's tariffs?Talking Points Economic analysts are split on what the tariffs could mean for employees
-
Volkswagen on the ropes: a crisis of its own makingTalking Point The EV revolution has 'left VW in the proverbial dust'
-
The row over UK maternity payTalking Points Tory leadership hopeful Kemi Badenoch implied that taxpayer-funded benefit was 'excessive' and called for 'greater responsibility'
-
Post Office: still-troubled horizonsTalking Point Sub-postmasters continue to report issues with Horizon IT system behind 'one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British legal history'
-
The UK's national debt: a terrifying warningTalking Points OBR's 'grim' report on Britain's fiscal outlook warns of skyrocketing spending, but 'projection' is not a 'forecast'
-
Copper coins: are they doomed?Talking Point Treasury says no new 1ps and 2ps needed due to declining use – but would we really miss them?
-
Barcelona's Airbnb ban: a sign of things to come?Talking Point Crackdown on short-term lets to combat unaffordable housing echoes similar moves elsewhere, but anti-tourism protests could prove self-defeating
-
Is this the end of the big night out?Talking Point Bar closures and Gen Z teetotallers threaten 'extinction' for 'messy nights on the town'
