Could Fed interest rate cuts tip the election?
The central bank could make interest rate cuts during a campaign focused on the economy


Federal Reserve leaders held off on making what is expected to be the first of several expected 2024 interest rate cuts last week and signaled they might wait months before getting started. Recent data has shown that inflation — a focus in this year's presidential election campaign — is cooling. But the economy has been growing faster than expected despite higher borrowing costs, so there's still a danger prices could surge again, reported USA Today.
Some economists had predicted the Fed would start cutting its benchmark interest rate, currently set between 5.25% and 5.5%, in March now that inflation is nearing the central bank's 2% target. Its preferred inflation measure is at 2.6%. But Fed Chair Jerome Powell said he didn't think "the committee will reach a level of confidence by the time of the March meeting" to start lowering rates.
The impact of interest rate cuts on the economy could be huge, boosting stocks and consumer spending heading into a presidential election "pivoting in no small part on voters' perceptions of President Joe Biden's economic stewardship," according to The Associated Press. The Fed's statement suggests the first rate cut could be several months away, so it could fall at a key point in the 2024 presidential campaign. Former President Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, said Powell was "political" and would "do something to probably help the Democrats," like lowering rates. Could the central bank's decision on when to cut rates tip the November vote?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Inevitable interest rate cuts will boost Biden
Fed officials don't "set interest rates with presidential elections in mind," wrote Jim Tankersley in The New York Times. "But the growing likelihood that the Fed might begin to cut rates this year could provide an election-year assist to President Biden." It looks like the Fed might raise rates several times before Election Day, which could lower mortgage rates and boost the housing market. Whatever happens this year, the Fed apparently "already, and unintentionally, helped Mr. Biden's re-election prospects by holding rates steady for the back half of 2023 as inflation cooled," because more rate hikes could have triggered a recession.
If the Fed is as politicized as "cynics" think, a "surprise March cut could still be in the cards," Albert Edwards, a strategist at French investment bank Société Générale, said in a note, as reported by Fortune. "Trump's lead is even greater now than it was in mid-December," so if Fed policymakers do "covertly favor" Biden's reelection they have more incentive than ever to "start easing in March and press their foot hard onto the gas pedal." Even if they don't have a preferred candidate, Fed officials certainly don't want to be blamed for tanking the economy in the middle of a "contentious" campaign.
Waiting until after Election Day might be best
The Fed is "damned if they do, and damned if they don't," Santander chief economist Stephen Stanley told Bloomberg. Cutting rates early could help Biden; waiting could help Trump. But Fed leaders don't "want to make newspaper headlines in the heat of the election season." Cutting rates now might not look political, but doing it deeper into the campaign could look bad. Fortunately for the Fed, waiting makes sense, because inflation isn't tamed yet. It's cooling because "noisy" things like travel and used car prices are falling, but we're not in the clear. Look for two interest-rate cuts this year — after Election Day.
With inflation down sharply and "within striking distance" of the Fed's target, there's "no rationale" for keeping rates near 5.5%, said Heather Long in The Washington Post. That would amount to "slamming the brakes on the economy." Sparking a recession "would almost certainly mean President Biden won't get reelected." The way to show neutrality is to start cutting rates in March and get them below 5% by the end of summer, then hold them steady while the general election campaign gets going in earnest. That "would lessen the Fed's influence on the election."
Deciding when to cut rates is never easy, said Nick Timiraos in The Wall Street Journal. But it's "doubly difficult" in "the glare of election-year politics," Trump supporters already accuse the central bank of helping "Biden by signaling that cuts are coming." Democrats are "nervous" the Fed will wait too long. Federal Reserve policymakers know they're in the spotlight, but "former Fed officials hotly dispute the suggestion that politics would weigh on when or how fast the central bank lowers interest rates this year." Whatever the Fed decides, Powell probably won't be able to "convince the most committed partisans" the decision wasn't motivated by politics. The trick will be explaining to everyone else the Fed is doing what's best for the economy, not a single candidate.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Harold Maass is a contributing editor at The Week. He has been writing for The Week since the 2001 debut of the U.S. print edition and served as editor of TheWeek.com when it launched in 2008. Harold started his career as a newspaper reporter in South Florida and Haiti. He has previously worked for a variety of news outlets, including The Miami Herald, ABC News and Fox News, and for several years wrote a daily roundup of financial news for The Week and Yahoo Finance.
-
The Japanese rice crisis
Under The Radar Japan's staple food is in short supply and everything from bad harvests to rising tourist numbers is being blamed
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 13, 2025
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - waiting it out, hiring freeze, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 cracking cartoons about broken nest eggs
Cartoons Artists take on plummeting value, sound advice, and more
By The Week US Published
-
What is the job market's future after Trump's tariffs?
Talking Points Economic analysts are split on what the tariffs could mean for employees
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Trump tariffs: five scenarios for the world's economy
The Explainer A US recession? A trade war with China? How 'Liberation Day' could realign the globe
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Discount stores were thriving. How did they stumble?
The Explainer Blame Walmart — and inflation
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Safe harbor: Gold rises as stocks sink
feature It's a golden age for goldbugs
By The Week US Published
-
The battle over Jamaican rum
Under The Radar The spirit that defines the Caribbean is at the middle of a legal fight
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published
-
How Trump's 'Liberation Day' might affect the economy
Talking Points Tariffs will rise, but consumer confidence is down
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What does Musk's 'Dexit' from Delaware mean for the future of US business?
Talking Points A 'billionaires' bill' could limit shareholder lawsuits
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Could a private equity deal be the end of Walgreens?
Today's Big Question The pharmacy chain will be taken private in a $10 billion deal
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published