Democrats didn't kill the filibuster. Republicans might.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4af7b/4af7b4c38370a81164e15f955c12df1d09b1cd3b" alt="Politics."
Filibuster reform is dead. Long live filibuster reform.
As expected, Democrats tried and failed on Wednesday night to change Senate rules in order to pass voting rights legislation with a simple majority. But it was a close call: Only Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) broke with their party to defeat the effort. If Dems had been able to swing just two more votes to their side, they could have broken the filibuster — at least on election issues.
That left some anti-filibuster observers expressing a sort of guarded optimism. "It's cold comfort, but from where we were in, say, 2012 or 2016, it's much more shocking that 48 Senate Democrats supported a rules change to pass voting rights than that two didn't," New York Times columnist Ezra Klein wrote on Twitter. "This isn't the sort of defeat that should discourage. This is the sort that should mobilize. Democrats don't need 10 or 20 more Senate seats to pass these bills. They need two. That's it."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Adam Jentleson, a former staffer for the late Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and the author of Kill Switch, a history of the filibuster, was even bolder: "The filibuster is a dead man walking. The only remaining question is who wields the knife and to what end."
My prediction: It will happen in 2025. Republicans will do it. And they might do it — in a horrific irony — in order to pass "election integrity" legislation.
That's pretty specific, so here's my reasoning: Democrats are on track to lose their "trifecta" control of the federal government during this year's midterm elections — they'll probably lose the House and could lose the Senate too. It only makes sense to blow up the filibuster if your party has the trifecta: Why make a ruckus in the Senate if the House won't pass your legislation, or if the president will veto it? The next chance for Republicans to unify the government is in 2025. Given President Biden's approval ratings these days, it could well happen.
But wait. Haven't Senate Republicans just spent the last few days speechifying about the glories of the filibuster? Sure. But filibuster politics eventually makes hypocrites of us all. And on things that conservatives really want — like tax cuts or confirming Supreme Court nominees — Republicans have already created or taken advantage of existing carve-outs to the rule.
These days, conservatives want one more thing — laws to crack down on (nearly non-existent) election fraud. That will probably remain true as long as Donald Trump remains the preeminent power in the GOP. If he wins election in 2024, he'll almost certainly demand an end to the filibuster. He'll probably get it.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Classic car insurance: how best to protect your vintage vehicle
The Explainer Insuring your classic car may be cheaper than you think
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published
-
Celebrating 250 years of Jane Austen
The Week Recommends From exhibitions to Regency balls, these are the best ways to commemorate the author
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
The pressure of South Korea's celebrity culture
In The Spotlight South Korean actress Kim Sae-ron was laid to rest on Wednesday after an apparent suicide
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Will Trump lead to more or fewer nuclear weapons in the world?
Talking Points He wants denuclearization. But critics worry about proliferation.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why Trump and Musk are shutting down the CFPB
Talking Points And what it means for American consumers
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Are we now in a constitutional crisis?
Talking Points Trump and Musk defy Congress and the courts
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'School choice alone won't rescue America's failing K-12 education system'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What can Democrats do to oppose Trump?
Talking Points The minority party gets off to a 'slow start' in opposition
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
How Elon Musk is transforming American government
Talking Points Trump's ally is moving 'with lightning speed'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What is 'impoundment' and how does it work?
The Explainer The Trump administration grabbed at the 'power of the purse' in Congress, using a little-known executive action that could have massive implications for the future
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published