Democrats didn't kill the filibuster. Republicans might.


Filibuster reform is dead. Long live filibuster reform.
As expected, Democrats tried and failed on Wednesday night to change Senate rules in order to pass voting rights legislation with a simple majority. But it was a close call: Only Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) broke with their party to defeat the effort. If Dems had been able to swing just two more votes to their side, they could have broken the filibuster — at least on election issues.
That left some anti-filibuster observers expressing a sort of guarded optimism. "It's cold comfort, but from where we were in, say, 2012 or 2016, it's much more shocking that 48 Senate Democrats supported a rules change to pass voting rights than that two didn't," New York Times columnist Ezra Klein wrote on Twitter. "This isn't the sort of defeat that should discourage. This is the sort that should mobilize. Democrats don't need 10 or 20 more Senate seats to pass these bills. They need two. That's it."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Adam Jentleson, a former staffer for the late Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and the author of Kill Switch, a history of the filibuster, was even bolder: "The filibuster is a dead man walking. The only remaining question is who wields the knife and to what end."
My prediction: It will happen in 2025. Republicans will do it. And they might do it — in a horrific irony — in order to pass "election integrity" legislation.
That's pretty specific, so here's my reasoning: Democrats are on track to lose their "trifecta" control of the federal government during this year's midterm elections — they'll probably lose the House and could lose the Senate too. It only makes sense to blow up the filibuster if your party has the trifecta: Why make a ruckus in the Senate if the House won't pass your legislation, or if the president will veto it? The next chance for Republicans to unify the government is in 2025. Given President Biden's approval ratings these days, it could well happen.
But wait. Haven't Senate Republicans just spent the last few days speechifying about the glories of the filibuster? Sure. But filibuster politics eventually makes hypocrites of us all. And on things that conservatives really want — like tax cuts or confirming Supreme Court nominees — Republicans have already created or taken advantage of existing carve-outs to the rule.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
These days, conservatives want one more thing — laws to crack down on (nearly non-existent) election fraud. That will probably remain true as long as Donald Trump remains the preeminent power in the GOP. If he wins election in 2024, he'll almost certainly demand an end to the filibuster. He'll probably get it.
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
September 13 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Saturday's political cartoons include court-approved racial profiling and America's moral compass
-
Giorgio Armani obituary: designer revolutionised the business of fashion
In the Spotlight ‘King Giorgio’ came from humble beginnings to become a titan of the fashion industry and redefine 20th century clothing
-
Crossword: September 13, 2025
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
-
Graphic videos of Charlie Kirk’s death renew debate over online censorship
Talking Points Social media ‘promises unfiltered access, but without guarantees of truth and without protection from harm’
-
Trump's drug war is now a real shooting war
Talking Points The Venezuela boat strike was 'not a mere law enforcement action'
-
Can Trump put his tariffs on stronger legal footing?
Today's Big Question Appeals court says 'emergency' tariffs are improper
-
Truck drivers are questioning the Trump administration's English mandate
Talking Points Some have praised the rules, others are concerned they could lead to profiling
-
Gavin Newsom's Trump-style trolling roils critics while thrilling fans
TALKING POINTS The California governor has turned his X account into a cutting parody of Trump's digital cadence, angering Fox News conservatives
-
Costco is at the center of an abortion debate
Talking Points The decision to no longer stock the abortion pill came following a pressure campaign by conservatives
-
What's a pocket rescission and can Trump use one?
The Explainer The White House may try to use an obscure and prohibited trick to halt more spending
-
What does occupying Gaza accomplish for Israel?
Talking Points Risking a 'strategic dead-end' in the fight against Hamas