Trump vs. the arts: Fresh strikes against PBS and the NEA
Trump wants to cut funding for public broadcasting and the arts, which would save a little but cost a lot for red states

"Beating up on Sesame Street isn't necessarily the flex the GOP thinks it is," said Brian Lowry in The Wrap. But last week, President Trump drew cheers from his base when he sharpened his assault on PBS and NPR amid a wider culture war offensive. In a May 1 executive order, Trump demanded a cessation of federal funding to both media nonprofits "to the maximum extent allowed by law."
The president may in fact have no authority to end the $500 million in annual congressional funding that flows to PBS and NPR, as leaders of those organizations quickly argued. But while Trump and his allies claim that the cut would be justified because PBS and NPR's news and public affairs programming is biased, any across-the-board reduction achieved by the president "will inflict at least as much damage on those who live in states he carried in the last election as on bright-blue bastions of liberal elites." Rural stations rely far more heavily on federal funding than big-city stations, and if those stations go dark, so does the access of many households to Big Bird and other valued content.
On a related front, Trump's team just did something crueler, said the Chicago Tribune in an editorial. A day after the president's NPR/PBS decree, he released a proposed federal budget that would zero out funding for the National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities. Worse, arts organizations began receiving emails from the NEA telling them that grants they'd been promised would not be honored. Because the NEA "hasn't been a major source of arts funding for years," the damage of those sudden reversals may be somewhat limited. But no theater company should have a $25,000 hole blown open in its budget because of the president's political pettiness, as some have. If cruelty was Trump's actual intent, "it's un-American, unbecoming to his office and, frankly, pathetic." Should the president succeed in ending funding for the NEA, NEH, and the lesser-known Institute of Museum and Library Services, said Helen Stoilas in The Art Newspaper, the tax savings would amount to just over $2 per American. But even with just the job and grant cuts he's made already, "swaths of the country's cultural infrastructure have been dismantled."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The pushback Trump is getting on the broadcasting front is "occasionally hilarious," said Michael Goodwin in the New York Post. NPR and PBS claim they deserve special treatment because they're independent news sources, yet they both bring the same anti-Trump perspective that most legacy media outlets do. In terms of political messaging, "they not only want a monopoly, they also demand that taxpayers fund it." Whether or not you like the programming, attempting to end this funding by executive order is a direct "attack on Congress," said the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in an editorial. Past lawmakers created the public broadcasting system because they believed in its cultural and educational value. And because most of its funding comes from private sources, it too costs each American only about $2 a year.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How will the new tax deductions on auto loans work?
the explainer Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act introduced a tax deduction on auto loan interest — but eligibility for the tax break is limited
-
Is Trump actually going to prosecute Obama for 'treason'?
Today's Big Question Or is this just a distraction from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal?
-
5 best movie sequels of all time
The Week Recommends The second time is only sometimes as good as the first
-
Friendship: 'bromance' comedy starring Paul Rudd and Tim Robinson
The Week Recommends 'Lampooning and embracing' middle-aged male loneliness, this film is 'enjoyable and funny'
-
6 head-turning homes for town house living
Feature Featuring a roof deck with city views in South Carolina and a renovated Harlem brownstone in New York City
-
Bookish: delightful period detective drama from Mark Gatiss
The Week Recommends 'Cosy crime' series is a 'standout pleasure' in an Agatha Christie-style formula
-
Music Reviews: Justin Bieber, Wet Leg, and Clipse
Feature "Swag," "Moisturizer," and "Let God Sort Em Out"
-
Film reviews: Eddington and Don't Let's Go to the Dogs Tonight
Feature A New Mexico border town goes berserk and civil war through a child's eyes
-
Art Review: Hilma af Klint's What Stands Behind the Flowers
Feature Museum of Modern Art, New York City, through Sept. 27
-
Geoff Dyer's 6 favorite books about the realities of war
Feature The award-winning author recommends works by Ernie Pyle, Michael Herr, and more
-
Book review: 'A Marriage at Sea: A True Story of Love, Obsession, and Shipwreck'
Feature A couple works to keep their marriage together while lost at sea