The Week US
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Less than $3 per week

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • The Week Recommends
  • Newsletters
  • Cartoons
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • The Week Evening Review
    Trump’s target on Ilhan Omar, Canada’s future, and supermarket cyberattacks

     
    talking points

    What does the Omar probe mean for US citizenship?

    Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) is fighting to keep her citizenship. She’s under investigation by the Trump administration, whose officials suggest the immigrant lawmaker may not have lawfully become a citizen. Critics say the White House is weaponizing its powers to intimidate one of its fiercest critics in Congress.

    ‘Creeping totalitarianism’
    The administration aims to “ultimately deport” Omar, said The Wall Street Journal. The probe is focused on whether she or her father were truthful in their immigration and naturalization paperwork after leaving Somalia in the 1990s. 

    There’s a “process to denaturalize somebody” who has lied on their citizenship paperwork, said Border Czar Tom Homan on Fox News. “If she violated the law, then she will be held accountable."

    Omar denies committing fraud. Trump would “love to eliminate one of the most effective progressive voices in Congress,” her office said in a statement to the Journal.

    “This is a case of creeping totalitarianism,” said John Ganz at Unpopular Front. Trumpism originated with attacks on President Barack Obama’s citizenship, grounded in a fundamental belief that “some Americans are not really Americans, that their political rights are illegitimate.” And the investigation of Omar is the culmination of an effort to “transform citizenship from an inviolable right into a privilege granted or withdrawn at the sovereign’s discretion.”

    Omar would “probably not” be under investigation if she were not in Congress, said David Harsanyi at the Washington Examiner. But she “isn’t above the law, either.” If Omar gained her citizenship through dishonest means, then she “at the very minimum should not be serving in Congress.”

    ‘No reason to believe it will stop’
    The investigation demonstrates how the Trump administration sees citizenship “not as a right or a responsibility but as a reward” that can be taken away, said Emily Tamkin at The Forward. This power can be easily misused for “silencing political opposition.”

    Omar is facing investigation because she has “dared to criticize the president,” said Obama on X. There’s “no reason to believe it will stop with her.” The Trump administration’s “transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans.”

     
     
    QUOTE OF THE DAY

    ‘If we don’t win, there’s no money. If we do win, you’re getting it.’

    Trump, at a North Carolina rally, on directing the Justice Department to settle the Camp Lejeune water contamination claims only if the GOP wins in the midterms. “What we’re left with is another extraordinary example of Trump’s radical approach to transactional politics,” said MS NOW.

     
     
    today’s big question

    What’s Canada’s future after the referendum rejection? 

    Canada’s largest prairie province will remain part of the country, as voters in Alberta overwhelmingly denied an independence referendum that would have started the province on a path to separation. The ripple effect of the defeated referendum now appears set to echo across Canada.

    What did the commentators say?
    Most Albertans have no desire to break away. With 93% of the votes reported, nearly 76% of respondents chose to remain part of Canada, according to the preliminary referendum results. The vote “marks a major win for Prime Minister Mark Carney, who’s facing a trade and political war with the United States amid President Donald Trump’s higher tariffs and repeated suggestions of annexing the country,” said Al Jazeera. While the vote is clear, it may “not spell the end for a movement that has spent decades pushing for greater autonomy from the federal government.”

    Many Albertans are “expressing frustration that their views aren’t sufficiently represented by the Liberal government,” said Time. Still, many in the Canadian Parliament have been reluctant to support an independence push because Alberta is an “oil-rich province; mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction made up about a quarter of the province’s GDP in 2025.” Some in the province feel that “central Canada is taking advantage of Alberta” and that the “central government has, at times, through environmental regulations, for example, hindered the development of the oil resources,” said Andrew McDougall, a professor of political science at the University of Toronto Scarborough, to Time.

    The vote will precipitate further questions about “whether Alberta Premier Danielle Smith can maintain control of her party and the province,” said The Globe and Mail. Smith has consistently said she wants Alberta to be part of a “united Canada” but also has a “contentious relationship with the pro-Canada crowd, who have accused her of pandering to separatists.” The vote’s outcome is “unlikely to position Ms. Smith as an ally to the movement.”

    What next?
    Carney waxed poetic about the referendum’s defeat. Albertans “made a clear choice. They chose unity, to build together and to take care of each other,” he said on X. The results “mean that Albertans and all Canadians will move forward together with renewed purpose.”

     
     

    Statistic of the day

    240 million acres: The amount of Amazon rainforest lost through 2025 — 15% of its original forest cover, according to the nonprofit Amazon Conservation’s Monitoring of the Andes Amazon Program. Between 2022 and 2025, an area nearly 15 times the size of Yellowstone National Park was lost.

     
     
    THE EXPLAINER

    Supermarkets present a new opportunity for hackers

    In France, hackers recently set their sights on an unusual target: supermarkets. After hundreds of French grocers had their refrigerators breached and taken offline, many are worried that attacks like these could become commonplace, including in the U.S.

    How do hackers do it?
    With the French grocery stores, criminals “remotely connected to refrigeration equipment” and “switched on defrost cycles that led to the loss of large quantities of fresh and frozen goods,” said CNN. Most shop fridges are connected to online controllers, allowing “maintenance firms to adjust the temperature remotely,” but this also makes the fridges vulnerable to hackers who can disable certain settings.

    This isn’t the first instance of a widespread supermarket hack. In 2025, United Natural Foods, which supplies frozen foods to grocers in the U.S. and Canada, “discovered a cyberattack that forced it to take its systems offline,” said Al Jazeera. And last year, conglomerate Ahold Delhaize USA, which owns grocery chains like Food Lion and Stop & Shop, was the “victim of a cyberattack that disrupted operations at more than 2,000 stores.” Also, British chain Marks & Spencer suffered a 2025 hacking incident that reportedly cost $397 million.

    How can this be prevented?
    Most experts say consumers don’t have to be worried for now. But it’s a different story for businesses. “Smart appliances connected to the internet will always be vulnerable as hackers seize on security lapses to log in to the systems remotely and trigger malicious features,” said cybersecurity analyst Steven Lachance to Al Jazeera. These breaches also highlight “vulnerabilities in global food supplies that can be quickly and dangerously exploited,” said CNET. 

    To protect businesses, experts typically recommend “changing default passwords, enabling two-factor authentication where ⁠available and regularly ​installing software updates,” said Reuters. The “simplest rule is often the most ​effective: The fewer connected devices you have, the fewer potential entry points exist for attackers.”

    Despite precautions, incidents like this remain the “next frontier for sabotage attacks,” said Muhammad Yahya Patel, the virtual chief information security officer at cybersecurity firm Huntress, to Bloomberg. Technology has now been “weaponized against food retail infrastructure,” and the “immediate financial consequences are significant and visible.”

     
     

    Good day 🎭

    … for English literature. William Shakespeare has been identified as the principal writer of “Edward III,” a historical play published anonymously in 1596, according to the U.K.’s University of Kent. New evidence establishes that Shakespeare wrote the play “beyond any reasonable doubt,” said study co-author Dr. Rory Loughnane in a statement.

     
     

    Bad day 📉

    … for AI profits. Anthropic had a net loss of over $80 billion in the first half of this year, largely from $72 billion in funding-related accounting charges, according to The Wall Street Journal. The artificial-intelligence conglomerate, known for its chatbot Claude, also lost $13 billion last year.

     
     
    Picture of the day

    Besieged

    Saudi-backed Yemeni government fighters fire a truck-mounted recoilless rifle during battle against Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis at the Jabal Han front west of Taiz. The attack has “cut humanitarian supplies” to the city, according to the U.N., leaving “many of its inhabitants without food and other essentials,” said Al Jazeera.

    Ahmad Al-Basha / AFP / Getty Images

     
     
    Puzzles

    Daily sudoku

    Challenge yourself with The Week’s daily sudoku, part of our puzzles section, which also includes guess the number

    Play here

     
     
    The Week recommends

    The very best of Stephen King’s many books 

    A new “Carrie” adaptation has introduced this month another generation to the storytelling prowess of horror icon Stephen King. These are the best of the hundreds of novels King fans have devoured for decades.

    ‘The Shining’ (1977)
    Literary critics and fans often say “The Shining” is “one of King’s most important novels” and “with good reason,” said Forbes. The book follows writer Jack Torrance and his family to the haunted Overlook Hotel in the isolated Colorado mountains. It’s a good read for fans who enjoy “psychological thrillers that merge with horror.” ($20, Penguin Random House)

    ‘The Stand’ (1978)
    King’s eerie postapocalyptic novel “The Stand,” set in a “world ravaged by a ruthless pandemic,” follows an ensemble of characters across the “new, dangerous country.” The story builds to a “climactic battle between heaven and hell,” said Reader’s Digest. It’s a tale of “spiritual and sinister wonders” told with King’s “distinct wit and writing style.” ($22, Penguin Random House)

    ‘The Dark Tower 1: The Gunslinger’ (1982)
    The seven-book “Dark Tower” series is King’s “truest Tolkien analogue,” said The New York Times. It’s an epic in “multiple modes (horror, sci-fi, fantasy, Western)” about a “gunslinger-knight” trying to save the world from “complete destruction by his foe, the Man in Black.” ($29, Simon & Schuster)

    ‘It’ (1986)
    King’s “treatise on everything he has learned about his dark craft" is “poured into the story of Pennywise,” a fear-eating shapeshifting entity, and the “gaggle of outcast children who choose to fight” the creature, said Esquire. The book’s eccentricity balances perfectly with the “romanticized myth of childhood summers” during 1960s Maine. ($25, Simon & Schuster)

     
     

    Poll watch

    A third of Americans (33%) support a second execution attempt of a convict if the first one fails, according to a Reuters/Ipsos survey of 1,679 adults. But 39% want death row inmate Christa Pike to serve life in prison after her botched execution in Tennessee last month. 

     
     
    INSTANT OPINION

    Today’s best commentary

    ‘Trump wants to erase race from the census but only on his terms’
    Angela Saini at The Boston Globe
    The Trump administration is “looking to remove race and ethnicity questions from the next U.S. census,” but “these categories have served to further equality,” says Angela Saini. “If color-blindness is the Trump administration’s true aim here, how to explain its simultaneous demand that universities provide race data on incoming students?” It’s “hard not to wonder whether the goal is not really to remove race classification from public life but to retain it for only conservative ends.”

    ‘Jalen Hurts played through a blood clot. Are NFL players cattle?’
    Andre Gee at The Guardian
    Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts is “likely to miss the rest of the NFL season after an ultrasound revealed blood clots in his lungs,” and “some have celebrated Hurts’ performance against the Jaguars as a feat of virility,” says Andre Gee. But to “many, it looks more like putting a player in real danger.” Football’s “culture demands players ‘tough it out,’” but was the game “so important that it was worth risking Hurts’ life”?

    ‘Go ahead, pity Elizabeth Holmes’
    Ryu Spaeth at New York magazine
    There’s “something stunted, almost upsettingly so, about the way we talk about ‘You Can See Everything,’” the documentary about the “disgraced Theranos founder,” Elizabeth Holmes, says Ryu Spaeth. The debates “revolve around how we should feel about the obvious but bizarrely repressed fact that Holmes is totally captivating, the source of the film’s eerie power.” People “shouldn’t feel bad for feeling bad” for Elizabeth Holmes, because she “represents something all too knowable and familiar.”

     
     
    WORD OF THE DAY

    smorrebrod

    The national dish of Denmark, consisting of smoked fish or cold cuts with spreads and garnishes atop rye bread (rugbrod) with a layer of butter (smor). The open-faced sandwich has been stripped down to a new, more humble version called bolle med ost, aka BMO, with just a slice of cheese on buttered bread. 
     
     

    Evening Review was written and edited by Theara Coleman, Nadia Croes, Scott Hocker, Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, Justin Klawans and Joel Mathis with illustrations by Stephen Kelly.

    Image credits, from top:  Illustration by Stephen P. Kelly / Getty Images / AP Photo; John Diep / Bloomberg / Getty Images; Fred Tanneau / AFP / Getty Images; Doubleday / Viking Penguin Inc. / Donald M. Grant Publishing
     

    Recent editions

    • Morning Report

      Ad turns Ohio governor’s race even uglier

    • Evening Review

      Who will lead the House GOP next Congress?

    • Morning Report

      Trump says Russia ‘has been fine on Ukraine’

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week US is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.